From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32745 invoked by alias); 19 Jan 2004 13:51:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 32732 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2004 13:50:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO yosemite.airs.com) (209.128.65.135) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Jan 2004 13:50:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 19799 invoked by uid 10); 19 Jan 2004 13:50:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 25792 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jan 2004 13:50:51 -0000 From: Ian Lance Taylor To: Geoff Keating Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure? References: <20040118083738.10772.qmail@gossamer.airs.com> Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 13:51:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg01279.txt.bz2 Geoff Keating writes: > Ian Lance Taylor writes: > > ... > > Any thoughts? Does anybody think this would be a waste of time? Does > > anybody have a better approach to solving the general problem? > > What happens if you compile with --enable-intermodule? targetm is not a const structure, so I can't see gcc knowing that some of the fields in fact do not change. But I haven't actually tried it. Ian