From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>
To: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>,
Matt Austern <austern@apple.com>,
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: C++: Why do we nreverse CLASSTYPE_TAGS
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2003 16:20:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3u1dmguiv.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <wvld6kgne92.fsf@prospero.boston.redhat.com>
Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> writes:
| On 25 Mar 2003 06:38:33 +0100, Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net> wrote:
|
| > Yes. However, a linear search is done when looking for nested-types
| > in decl.c:lookup_tag(). Replacing current_binding_level->tags with a
| > hash-table turned out to affect CLASSTYPE_TAGS also since we do some
| > random assignments here and there...
|
| Do we still need to use current_binding_level->tags to find types?
Similarly, we don't need to have two separate bindings,
IDENTIFIER_BINDINGS and IDENTIFIER_NAMESPACE_BINDINGS.
-- Gaby
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-29 13:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-24 18:23 Gabriel Dos Reis
2003-03-24 18:34 ` Mark Mitchell
2003-03-24 19:18 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2003-03-24 19:36 ` Mark Mitchell
2003-03-24 19:56 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2003-03-24 20:05 ` Mark Mitchell
2003-03-24 20:08 ` Matt Austern
2003-03-24 20:48 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2003-03-24 20:55 ` Matt Austern
2003-03-24 21:38 ` Mike Stump
2003-03-24 22:19 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-03-24 21:51 ` Mark Mitchell
2003-03-24 22:33 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2003-03-25 3:13 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2003-03-25 6:38 ` Jason Merrill
2003-03-25 6:42 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2003-03-25 6:59 ` Jason Merrill
2003-03-25 11:26 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2003-03-29 16:20 ` Gabriel Dos Reis [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3u1dmguiv.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net \
--to=gdr@integrable-solutions.net \
--cc=austern@apple.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jason@redhat.com \
--cc=mark@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).