From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29938 invoked by alias); 31 Jan 2003 00:22:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29912 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2003 00:22:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO uniton.integrable-solutions.net) (62.212.99.186) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 31 Jan 2003 00:22:54 -0000 Received: from uniton.integrable-solutions.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uniton.integrable-solutions.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/SuSE Linux 0.6) with ESMTP id h0V0MVjj019495; Fri, 31 Jan 2003 01:22:32 +0100 Received: (from gdr@localhost) by uniton.integrable-solutions.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id h0V0MVYl019494; Fri, 31 Jan 2003 01:22:31 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: uniton.integrable-solutions.net: gdr set sender to gdr@integrable-solutions.net using -f To: Joe Buck , Paolo Carlini Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release (second iteration) References: <15927.61897.77306.255799@gauvain.inria.fr> <20030129135455.A10912@synopsys.com> From: Gabriel Dos Reis In-Reply-To: <20030129135455.A10912@synopsys.com> Organization: Integrable Solutions Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 00:59:00 -0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg01702.txt.bz2 Joe Buck writes: | On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 04:25:34PM +0100, Gabriel Dos_Reis wrote: | | > I uploaded 3.2.2 pre-release (second iteration) tarballs on the FTP | > server as | > | > ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/gcc-*3.2.2-20030129.* | > | > As usual, please donwload and test them. Report problems to me and | > fill GNATS PRs. | | I just tested on GNU/Linux, and I am seeing new failures since yesterday's | tarball (yesterday I had no unexpected gcc or g++ failures, and now | there are a total of 11, from 5 distinct tests). See | | http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2003-01/msg01306.html | | It's an "up2date" Red Hat 7.2 box with binutils-2.13.1. | | Could someone else run the tests and try to verify this? Paolo Carlini writes: | I'm also seeing those failures, unfortunately, and also: | | FAIL: g++.eh/spec6.C (test for excess errors) Joe, Paolo -- I'm also seeing those failures with the tarball I uploaded but not on current version of gcc-3_2-branch (which will be the next iteration). I looked into the failures and cannot find out which patches could have possibly caused those failures. All failures seem to be "syntax error". I'm inclined to conlude that the environment I used to prepare the second iteration (which is at work) might be insane [it is the one which started the reduce/reduce conflit thread]. I would like you run the testsuite again but for current CVS gcc-3_2-branch and report the results. Thank you very much for your time. -- Gaby