From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25033 invoked by alias); 13 Jul 2009 21:39:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 25024 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Jul 2009 21:39:45 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.45.13) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 21:39:36 +0000 Received: from wpaz5.hot.corp.google.com (wpaz5.hot.corp.google.com [172.24.198.69]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id n6DLdYAZ021374 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 14:39:34 -0700 Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wafl24.prod.google.com [10.114.188.24]) by wpaz5.hot.corp.google.com with ESMTP id n6DLdV5g031455 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 14:39:32 -0700 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id l24so446105waf.24 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 14:39:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.39.3 with SMTP id m3mr9406768wam.135.1247521171151; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 14:39:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain.google.com (adsl-71-133-8-30.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net [71.133.8.30]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j31sm9550262waf.33.2009.07.13.14.39.30 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 13 Jul 2009 14:39:30 -0700 (PDT) To: Janboe Ye Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, janboe.ye@gmail.com Subject: Re: how to use expand_builtin_alloca References: <1247519293.4414.16.camel@debian-nb> <1247520408.4414.20.camel@debian-nb> From: Ian Lance Taylor Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 21:39:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <1247520408.4414.20.camel@debian-nb> (Janboe Ye's message of "Mon\, 13 Jul 2009 16\:26\:48 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-System-Of-Record: true X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00226.txt.bz2 Janboe Ye writes: > Is it possible to override alloc to do the same thing as > expand_buitlin_alloca in application codes? I don't know of any way to do that when using mudflap. If there were such a way, it would imply that mudflap were broken, or that there is a special way to work around it. Can't you simply not use mudflap? Ian