From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-104053-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 18982 invoked by alias); 14 Oct 2004 03:11:08 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 18975 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2004 03:11:07 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO merlin.cs.tamu.edu) (128.194.146.35)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 14 Oct 2004 03:11:07 -0000
Received: by merlin.cs.tamu.edu (Postfix, from userid 500)
	id D54C33553E; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 22:11:04 -0500 (CDT)
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Cc: Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@apple.com>, GCC <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++)
References: <ckdds6$kpt$1@sea.gmane.org> <416B89F2.1030606@gmail.com>
	<EA40BBB3-1C85-11D9-A9EA-000A95B1F520@apple.com>
	<m3r7o3k8kq.fsf@merlin.cs.tamu.edu> <87brf735or.fsf@codesourcery.com>
	<m3sm8j707s.fsf@merlin.cs.tamu.edu>
	<EF6C8BC8-1D4B-11D9-AE87-000A95B1F520@apple.com>
	<m3zn2q4ak6.fsf@merlin.cs.tamu.edu>
	<0B22A446-1D60-11D9-A665-0030657EA24A@apple.com>
	<m3is9e472m.fsf@merlin.cs.tamu.edu>
	<47ED2492-1D65-11D9-B78D-000A95B1F520@apple.com>
	<m37jpu45p8.fsf@merlin.cs.tamu.edu> <jeis9e9msi.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@cs.tamu.edu>
In-Reply-To: <jeis9e9msi.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
Organization: Texas A&M University, Department of Computer Science
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 07:10:00 -0000
Message-ID: <m3vfde2dvb.fsf@merlin.cs.tamu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg00551.txt.bz2

Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de> writes:

| Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@cs.tamu.edu> writes:
| 
| > Gosh, scratch "object" if that bothers you.
| >
| >   It does not matter whether the lvalue is used to modify a small part
| >   of or the  whole *p.
| 
| Where does the standard state that qualifying a struct member makes the
| whole struct qualified?

I said *nonmodifiable*.  

And the standard quote is the one you left out.

-- Gaby