Re: Serious problems with tree-ssa operand handling

[Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>]

Joe Buck <Joe.Buck@synopsys.COM> writes:

| On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 11:27:18AM -0400, Diego Novillo wrote:
| > On Tue, 2004-09-07 at 11:27, Richard Kenner wrote:
| > 
| > >     Do you have a variable that is a GIMPLE reg and at the same time
| > >     belongs to an alias set or its address is taken?
| > > 
| > > Yes.  See my later message.
| > >
| > What later message?  Thanks to your reluctance to use a properly
| > threading mailer, I find it impossible to follow the threads that you
| > contribute to.  Lately, I have had to start ignoring threads that you
| > break with your MUA, so I don't know what you are talking about.
| 
| Agreed; any long thread Kenner participates in is unreadable.
| 
| Here's an item for the projects file: let's call it "deKennerize".  Given
| an mbox file full of gcc messages, try to deduce what message each message
| from Richard Kenner is replying to, using subjects, dates, recipients, and
| quoted text as clues.  Produce a new mbox file with proper References or
| In-Reply-To headers added.
| 
| This is easiest given a Perl or Python module that supports parsing of
| mbox files into messages and headers.

I would think it would be easier if Richar Kenner accepted to use a
MUA that does not break things.  Even Robert Dewar eventually swicthed to
something helpful.

-- Gaby