From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-65298-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 17756 invoked by alias); 27 Dec 2002 19:48:53 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 17729 invoked from network); 27 Dec 2002 19:48:51 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO uniton.integrable-solutions.net) (62.212.99.186)
  by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 27 Dec 2002 19:48:51 -0000
Received: from uniton.integrable-solutions.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by uniton.integrable-solutions.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/SuSE Linux 0.6) with ESMTP id gBRJlt1F009278;
	Fri, 27 Dec 2002 20:47:55 +0100
Received: (from gdr@localhost)
	by uniton.integrable-solutions.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id gBRJlsvb009277;
	Fri, 27 Dec 2002 20:47:54 +0100
X-Authentication-Warning: uniton.integrable-solutions.net: gdr set sender to gdr@integrable-solutions.net using -f
To: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Phil Edwards <phil@jaj.com>, Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>,
   "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: What are the chances of another release from gcc-3_2-branch?
References: <60950000.1040324560@warlock.codesourcery.com>
From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>
In-Reply-To: <60950000.1040324560@warlock.codesourcery.com>
Organization: Integrable Solutions
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 13:21:00 -0000
Message-ID: <m3wulvi6qd.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg01472.txt.bz2

Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> writes:

| --On Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:54:13 AM -0500 Phil Edwards
| <phil@jaj.com> wrote:
| 
| > On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 10:42:01PM -0600, Michael Elizabeth Chastain
| > wrote:
| >> My question: is it safe for me to stop testing gcc-3_2-branch?  That is,
| >> what are the chances of another gcc release such as a "gcc 3.2.2" coming
| >> from the gcc-3_2-branch?
| 
| I don't think any decision has been made.  Personally, I'm trying to focus
| on 3.3/3.4; there's plenty enough to do there.  But, if people want another
| 3.2 release we can do one.
| 
| If someone else wants to step forward to run a 3.2.2 release, that would
| be fine, too.

I think a 3.2.2 release will be of great help as it has non-negligible
fixes.

If the only obstacle for having such a release is lack of time, then I
would volunteer for making that release provided I'm explained the
necessary steps.

-- Gaby