From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-67459-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 23333 invoked by alias); 3 Feb 2003 19:31:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 23165 invoked from network); 3 Feb 2003 19:31:27 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO uniton.integrable-solutions.net) (62.212.99.186)
  by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 3 Feb 2003 19:31:27 -0000
Received: from uniton.integrable-solutions.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by uniton.integrable-solutions.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/SuSE Linux 0.6) with ESMTP id h13JVDH2012463;
	Mon, 3 Feb 2003 20:31:13 +0100
Received: (from gdr@localhost)
	by uniton.integrable-solutions.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id h13JVCpl012462;
	Mon, 3 Feb 2003 20:31:12 +0100
X-Authentication-Warning: uniton.integrable-solutions.net: gdr set sender to gdr@integrable-solutions.net using -f
To: "Wesley W. Terpstra" <terpstra@ito.tu-darmstadt.de>
Cc: Mark Mielke <mark@mark.mielke.cc>, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Warnings for unhandled c++ exceptions?
References: <20030203131345.GA25136@ito.tu-darmstadt.de>
	<20030203192141.GA31316@mark.mielke.cc>
	<20030203192409.GA27669@ito.tu-darmstadt.de>
From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>
In-Reply-To: <20030203192409.GA27669@ito.tu-darmstadt.de>
Organization: Integrable Solutions
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2003 19:31:00 -0000
Message-ID: <m3y94xp3en.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00108.txt.bz2

"Wesley W. Terpstra" <terpstra@ito.tu-darmstadt.de> writes:

| There are lots of warnings for behaviours that are *legal* C++ but
| unethical. 

These words ("legal", "unethical") sound wrong to me.  Right now
you're the first person using them in this discussion.  I don't know
why... 

-- Gaby