From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>
To: Robert Dewar <dewar@gnat.com>
Cc: Diego Novillo <dnovillo@redhat.com>,
Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org>,
Richard Kenner <kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu>,
"gcc@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>,
Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Ada mainline
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2004 22:41:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3zn3zoyt6.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41412435.5060600@gnat.com>
Robert Dewar <dewar@gnat.com> writes:
| Hmm I just read Diego's entire response, and it seems to
| amount to "the Ada patches should be handled the same
| way as the C++ patches", but it doesn't say why. I also
| didn't get an answer to my question of whether
| Diego was speaking as a an Ada expert or Ada user (I
| assume not), which I think is definitely relevant.
|
| I really think that the Ada front end is quite different
| from the C++ front end.
Is that a word from a C++ expert too?
Sorry, I could not resist.
The main point has been made by RTH.
-- Gaby
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-09 22:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-09 19:22 Richard Kenner
2004-09-09 21:00 ` Daniel Berlin
2004-09-09 21:18 ` Robert Dewar
2004-09-09 21:22 ` Diego Novillo
2004-09-09 21:39 ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-09-09 21:52 ` Robert Dewar
2004-09-09 22:15 ` Richard Henderson
2004-09-09 22:38 ` Diego Novillo
2004-09-09 23:00 ` Robert Dewar
2004-09-09 22:41 ` Gabriel Dos Reis [this message]
2004-09-09 23:06 ` Robert Dewar
[not found] ` <4140D9D6.504@bellsouth.net>
2004-09-09 22:57 ` Robert Dewar
2004-09-09 23:11 ` Robert Dewar
2004-09-09 23:14 ` Richard Henderson
2004-09-09 23:19 ` Robert Dewar
2004-09-10 11:27 ` Laurent GUERBY
2004-09-09 21:54 ` Robert Dewar
2004-09-09 23:31 ` Kaveh R. Ghazi
2004-09-10 15:55 ` Manfred Hollstein
2004-09-09 21:29 ` Daniel Berlin
2004-09-09 21:57 ` Robert Dewar
2004-09-09 22:32 ` Diego Novillo
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-09-10 12:34 Richard Kenner
2004-09-10 14:50 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-09-10 1:59 Richard Kenner
2004-09-10 8:45 ` Robert Dewar
2004-09-10 9:50 ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-09-10 15:40 ` James A. Morrison
2004-09-09 22:37 D. Starner
2004-09-09 22:53 ` Robert Dewar
2004-09-10 0:38 ` Florian Weimer
2004-09-10 15:02 ` Paul Koning
2004-09-10 17:40 ` Matt Austern
2004-09-09 12:06 Richard Kenner
2004-09-09 12:54 ` Arnaud Charlet
2004-09-09 13:13 ` Jan Hubicka
2004-09-09 13:36 ` Arnaud Charlet
2004-09-09 13:43 ` Jan Hubicka
2004-09-09 13:47 ` Paolo Bonzini
2004-09-09 13:48 ` Paolo Bonzini
2004-09-09 13:50 ` Arnaud Charlet
2004-09-09 14:05 ` Arnaud Charlet
2004-09-09 14:03 ` Diego Novillo
2004-09-09 14:51 ` Arnaud Charlet
2004-09-09 18:50 ` Richard Henderson
2004-09-09 11:37 Laurent GUERBY
2004-09-09 11:51 ` Giovanni Bajo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3zn3zoyt6.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net \
--to=gdr@integrable-solutions.net \
--cc=dberlin@dberlin.org \
--cc=dewar@gnat.com \
--cc=dnovillo@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu \
--cc=rth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).