From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-102341-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 27084 invoked by alias); 9 Sep 2004 22:38:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 27075 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2004 22:38:21 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO uniton.integrable-solutions.net) (62.212.99.186)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 9 Sep 2004 22:38:21 -0000
Received: from uniton.integrable-solutions.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by uniton.integrable-solutions.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/SuSE Linux 0.6) with ESMTP id i89MZobR032220;
	Fri, 10 Sep 2004 00:35:50 +0200
Received: (from gdr@localhost)
	by uniton.integrable-solutions.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id i89MZnre032219;
	Fri, 10 Sep 2004 00:35:49 +0200
X-Authentication-Warning: uniton.integrable-solutions.net: gdr set sender to gdr@integrable-solutions.net using -f
To: Robert Dewar <dewar@gnat.com>
Cc: Diego Novillo <dnovillo@redhat.com>, Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org>,
   Richard Kenner <kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu>,
   "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>, Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Ada mainline
References: <10409091923.AA12646@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu>
	<79827BF4-02A2-11D9-A411-000D93B1B044@dberlin.org>
	<414119C0.7080607@gnat.com>
	<1094764711.4828.12.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	<41412435.5060600@gnat.com>
From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>
In-Reply-To: <41412435.5060600@gnat.com>
Organization: Integrable Solutions
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2004 22:41:00 -0000
Message-ID: <m3zn3zoyt6.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg00528.txt.bz2

Robert Dewar <dewar@gnat.com> writes:

| Hmm I just read Diego's entire response, and it seems to
| amount to "the Ada patches should be handled the same
| way as the C++ patches", but it doesn't say why. I also
| didn't get an answer to my question of whether
| Diego was speaking as a an Ada expert or Ada user (I
| assume not), which I think is definitely relevant.
| 
| I really think that the Ada front end is quite different
| from the C++ front end.

Is that a word from a C++ expert too?

Sorry, I could not resist.

The main point has been made by RTH.

-- Gaby