From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9615 invoked by alias); 9 Dec 2003 09:46:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 9608 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2003 09:46:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dromion.integrable-solutions.net) (208.180.29.75) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Dec 2003 09:46:04 -0000 Received: by dromion.integrable-solutions.net (Postfix on SuSE Linux 8.0 (i386), from userid 500) id 6AB1F4C7F7; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 10:45:46 +0100 (CET) To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: GCC-3.3.3 release status (2003-12-08) From: Gabriel Dos Reis Organization: Integrable Solutions Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 11:25:00 -0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00571.txt.bz2 Hi, The number of regressions targetted for gcc-3_3-branch is 66. That number was 68 last week. That appears to be a very slow progress; but the fact is that it does not capture the reality. Actually, in the past few days the back-end and middle-end people have been very active in tracking and fixing at least 13 PRs on the branch (some bug fixes don't have PR number so I may have missed some). Special thanks to Roger Sayle, Eric Botcazou, Andrew Pinski and the "bug masters". The C++ front-end is the winner of the competition 'who has the highest number of regressions' :-( It seems to have received no much attention (one regression fix). I'm still accepting non-regression bug fixes till December 31, but as we're approaching that date, I'll be more and more stringent. The idea is that I would not like to see many last minutes patches proposed for checking on December 31. Here is a detailed list of existing regressions as targetted for gcc-3_3-branch. Where I listed individuals, that means bugzilla says they are assigned the corresponding PR. * bootstrap: 7817, 13068 * C: 7544, 9209, 11392, 11527(rth) * C++: 11554, 11697(mmitchel), 11948, 12491, 12507, 12667, 12724, 12779, 12815, 12831, 12862, 13009, 13057, 13070, 13081, 13086, 13173, 13215, 13239, 13262(kriang), 13349 * debug: 6522, 11232, 1365 * inline-asm: 8788 * libgcj: 10353 * libstdc++: 7076(bkoz), 10703, 13351 * middle-end: 10776, 11397 * objc: 7993(shebs) * optimization: 10392, 11350(rth), 11496, 11841, 12441, 12442, 12576, 12965(ebotcazou), 13031, 13037(sayle), 13060(ebotcazou) * preprocessor: 13046 * target: 7940, 9201, 9365, 9552, 10692, 10730, 11226, 11271, 11578(kazu), 11587, 11793(aldyh), 11864, 11992, 12158, 12537, 13069 If you think you can help with any PR listed above, then your help is welcome and appreciated. Last report: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-12/msg00128.html Next report on December 15, 2003. Thanks, -- Gaby