public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
To: sudhakar govindavajhala <sudhakarg79spam@gmail.com>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Converting SIGSEGV etc. signals to exceptions
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 14:43:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <mcr62lsb0u5.fsf@coign.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGdJZsDajivsuZ+nMm552yzuoa2OOkmXa3wDFSed-=ggduqoZA@mail.gmail.com>	(sudhakar govindavajhala's message of "Sat, 20 Aug 2011 08:51:44	-0400")

sudhakar govindavajhala <sudhakarg79spam@gmail.com> writes:

> I am writing C++ code in Linux (2.6.18) using pthreads. glibc 2.5. gcc 4.1.2
>
> 1) I understand that signals SIGFPE and SIGSEGV are sent to individual
> threads while SIGINT is sent to the whole process.  How do I find out
> what signal is thread specific and what signal is process wide.  How
> does the OS/glibc determine which thread should be served the signal?
>
> 2) I would like to translate SIGSEGV or SIGFPE to an exception in the
> program so that it can be caught at higher levels. Is there a default
> option to convert a SIGSEGV to an exception?  For my tests, I provided
> a signal handler for SIGSEGV/SIGFPE that throws an int exception and
> it works. Is it legal to throw exceptions in signal handlers? Is there
> any limitation on what kind of object can be thrown as an exception?
> Could someone help me understand the rules in this space?
>
> 3) Could someone point me to  a sample to print the stack trace when
> an exception occurred?


This message is not appropriate for the mailing list gcc@gcc.gnu.org,
which is for gcc developers.  It would be appropriate for
gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org.  Please take any followups to gcc-help.  Thanks.

1) This is a question about the OS, not about gcc.  Any signal sent
using pthread_kill will be thread-specific.  Any signal generated by the
execution of an instruction will be thread-specific.  I don't know which
signals those are on GNU/Linux, but I suspect they are SIGSEGV, SIGFPE,
SIGILL, SIGBUS, and SIGTRAP.  There may be others.  A signal not
generated by the execution of an instruction would be one generated by a
call to raise or kill, or one trigged from the terminal such as SIGINT,
or one generated by the kernel on behalf of the program such as SIGIO or
SIGPIPE.

2) On GNU/Linux gcc supports using throw in a signal handler.  There are
no restrictions on what object you may throw.  Note that the operating
system imposes restrictions on what code you may run in a signal
handler.  E.g., it would be unwise to throw an object which use a
constructor which allocates memory.

3) man backtrace.

Ian

  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-20 14:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-20 12:51 sudhakar govindavajhala
2011-08-20 14:43 ` Ian Lance Taylor [this message]
2011-08-20 14:55 ` Paweł Sikora

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=mcr62lsb0u5.fsf@coign.corp.google.com \
    --to=iant@google.com \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=sudhakarg79spam@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).