public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: PATCH RFA: Build stages 2 and 3 with C++
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 07:48:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <mcrfwm63dut.fsf@coign.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+=Sn1k8qQs8C04rRFXUfTwD3ZLWu5Gt0iMLRoAZWh0NDm9vJA@mail.gmail.com>	(Andrew Pinski's message of "Fri, 15 Jul 2011 23:56:25 -0700")

Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com> writes:

> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 11:52 PM, Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com> wrote:
>> I would like to propose this patch as a step toward building gcc using a
>> C++ compiler.  This patch builds stage1 with the C compiler as usual,
>> and defaults to building stages 2 and 3 with a C++ compiler built during
>> stage 1.  This means that the gcc installed and used by most people will
>> be built by a C++ compiler.  This will ensure that gcc is fully
>> buildable with C++, while retaining the ability to bootstrap with only a
>> C compiler, not a C++ compiler.  This will permit us to experiment with
>> optionally using C++ for some code, using a #ifdef to select the C
>> implementation or the C++ implementation.
>>
>> I would suggest that we consider releasing 4.7 this way, as a small
>> trial for building gcc with C++.
>
> Do you build libstdc++ at stage1 also?  That is what happens if you
> don't have a C++ compiler to begin with.

Yes.  With this patch, we build cc1plus at stage 1, and use it to build
libstdc++ at stage 1, and use both to build stage 2.

Ian

  reply	other threads:[~2011-07-16  7:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-16  6:56 Ian Lance Taylor
2011-07-16  7:05 ` Andrew Pinski
2011-07-16  7:48   ` Ian Lance Taylor [this message]
2011-07-16  7:59     ` Basile Starynkevitch
2011-07-17  3:17       ` Ian Lance Taylor
2011-07-16 16:11 ` Diego Novillo
2011-07-16 22:58   ` Ian Lance Taylor
2011-07-17 10:36     ` Richard Guenther
2011-07-17 12:21       ` Eric Botcazou
2011-07-17 16:55         ` Richard Guenther
2011-07-17 17:55           ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-07-17 22:37             ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-09-04 17:20   ` Thomas Schwinge
2011-07-16 20:40 ` Toon Moene
2011-07-19 21:33 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2011-07-19 22:24   ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2011-07-20  0:46   ` H.J. Lu
2011-07-20  1:15     ` H.J. Lu
2011-07-20  6:28   ` David Edelsohn
2011-07-20  9:34     ` Jonathan Wakely
2011-07-20 11:02       ` Jonathan Wakely
2011-07-20 12:41         ` David Edelsohn
2011-07-20 12:48           ` Richard Guenther
2011-07-20 14:07             ` Diego Novillo
2011-07-20 14:34               ` Ian Lance Taylor
2011-07-20 15:35                 ` Jonathan Wakely
2011-07-20 15:06   ` Toon Moene
2011-07-20 15:23     ` Ian Lance Taylor
2011-07-20 15:53       ` David Edelsohn
2011-07-20 15:55         ` Ian Lance Taylor
2011-07-20 20:05           ` David Edelsohn
2011-07-20 20:53             ` Ian Lance Taylor
2011-07-20 21:06               ` Mike Stump
2011-07-21  0:10                 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2011-07-21  9:40                   ` Basile Starynkevitch
2011-07-21 16:06                     ` Ian Lance Taylor
2011-07-21 17:44                       ` Jakub Jelinek
2011-07-21 19:40                         ` Ian Lance Taylor
2011-07-21 20:12                           ` Basile Starynkevitch
2011-07-21 22:38                             ` Ian Lance Taylor
2011-07-21  6:57                 ` David Edelsohn
2011-07-21  7:25                   ` Eric Botcazou
2011-07-21 14:24               ` David Edelsohn
2011-07-20 17:58         ` Thomas Schwinge
2011-07-20 21:41     ` Toon Moene
2011-07-31 23:20 ` Marc Glisse
2011-08-01  9:14   ` Richard Guenther
2011-08-01  9:53     ` Joseph S. Myers
2011-08-01  9:59       ` Richard Guenther
2011-08-01 10:05       ` Marc Glisse
2011-08-08 17:42 ` Romain Geissler
2011-08-08 18:49   ` Ian Lance Taylor
2011-08-08 19:40     ` Romain Geissler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=mcrfwm63dut.fsf@coign.corp.google.com \
    --to=iant@google.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=pinskia@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).