From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22564 invoked by alias); 7 Jun 2010 14:48:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 22554 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Jun 2010 14:48:31 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (74.125.121.35) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 14:48:25 +0000 Received: from wpaz29.hot.corp.google.com (wpaz29.hot.corp.google.com [172.24.198.93]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id o57EmL2I025004 for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2010 07:48:22 -0700 Received: from pwi2 (pwi2.prod.google.com [10.241.219.2]) by wpaz29.hot.corp.google.com with ESMTP id o57EmK1R023215 for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2010 07:48:20 -0700 Received: by pwi2 with SMTP id 2so1681725pwi.36 for ; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 07:48:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.187.9 with SMTP id o9mr60761rvp.211.1275922100225; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 07:48:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from coign.google.com ([67.218.103.83]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b12sm4695600rvn.22.2010.06.07.07.48.17 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 07 Jun 2010 07:48:19 -0700 (PDT) To: NightStrike Cc: Diego Novillo , gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Patch pinging References: From: Ian Lance Taylor Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2010 15:00:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (nightstrike@gmail.com's message of "Mon\, 7 Jun 2010 07\:24\:43 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-06/txt/msg00280.txt.bz2 NightStrike writes: > On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Diego Novillo wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 14:09, NightStrike wrote: >> >>> threads that haven't been addressed. =C2=A0I offered to Ian to do the s= ame >>> thing for the whole mailing list if we can make it a policy that >>> people who commit changes do what Kai is doing so that it's clear that >>> the thread is done with. =C2=A0I don't mind throwing a few pings down, = and >>> I already have the whole ML tagged with a gmail label. >> >> Seems like a good idea to me. =C2=A0I do not usually read the list every >> day (or every week some times), so if a patch is in my area and I had >> not been directly CC'd, it can take me up to 2 weeks to get to it. >> >> Most of the areas I'm on had good coverage (particularly since I share >> much with richi who is a very prolific patch reviewer), so it's not >> too much of a problem. > > Ok. Is one person responding enough for me to start doing that? I > don't know how this sort of approval / acceptance process works for > GCC. I would say that since you did not get any objections, you should try it. Of course, you may well get objections at that point, in which case we should take the conversation back here. Thanks for volunteering. Ian