From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21800 invoked by alias); 24 Sep 2011 19:38:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 21791 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Sep 2011 19:38:17 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.44.51) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 19:38:01 +0000 Received: from wpaz9.hot.corp.google.com (wpaz9.hot.corp.google.com [172.24.198.73]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id p8OJc0oY018341 for ; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 12:38:00 -0700 Received: from yxi11 (yxi11.prod.google.com [10.190.3.11]) by wpaz9.hot.corp.google.com with ESMTP id p8OJbxwp010562 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 12:37:59 -0700 Received: by yxi11 with SMTP id 11so4891648yxi.22 for ; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 12:37:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.21.103 with SMTP id u7mr18185690pbe.129.1316893078900; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 12:37:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.21.103 with SMTP id u7mr18185676pbe.129.1316893078734; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 12:37:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from coign.google.com ([216.239.45.130]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e3sm52962095pbi.7.2011.09.24.12.37.57 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 24 Sep 2011 12:37:58 -0700 (PDT) From: Ian Lance Taylor To: Daniel Drake Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: ld build-id crash on ARM linking gcc References: Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 21:32:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Daniel Drake's message of "Sat, 24 Sep 2011 13:26:29 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-System-Of-Record: true X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-09/txt/msg00281.txt.bz2 Daniel Drake writes: > We have found a ld segfault that occurs early in the gcc compile > process - the first time it tries to link cc1. This is testing on > armv5tel. Issues with the GNU binutils should normall go to binutils@sourceware.org. See http://sourceware.org/binutils/ . I don't know what might have fixed this. I didn't see anything immediately obvious in the diff. If the backtrace can be trusted, the problem is that the length passed to sha1_process_bytes is far too large, but I don't know why. Ian