From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
To: Joe Buck <Joe.Buck@synopsys.COM>
Cc: Matt Austern <austern@apple.com>, Kevin Atkinson <kevina@gnu.org>,
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 00:30:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <or8yiisrg6.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040302151010.A10198@synopsys.com>
On Mar 2, 2004, Joe Buck <Joe.Buck@synopsys.COM> wrote:
> So we need to strike a balance.
How about: experimental extensions must only be enabled if a certain
flag is given in the command line? Like that of signatures, just to
mention an example of an extension that didn't go forward. Then we
still serve as a testbed, but we don't have backward-compatibility
issues to worry about.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Happy GNU Year! oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-03 0:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-29 5:50 Kevin Atkinson
2004-02-29 6:51 ` Mark Mielke
2004-02-29 6:56 ` Kevin Atkinson
2004-03-01 10:20 ` Nathan Sidwell
2004-03-01 13:51 ` Per Abrahamsen
2004-03-01 20:58 ` Kevin Atkinson
2004-03-01 23:05 ` Robert Dewar
2004-03-01 14:51 ` Jeff Sturm
2004-03-01 15:02 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-03-01 15:04 ` Nathan Sidwell
2004-03-01 18:53 ` Joe Buck
2004-03-02 10:01 ` Nathan Sidwell
2004-03-01 19:39 ` Jeff Sturm
2004-03-01 19:57 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-03-01 20:18 ` Joe Buck
2004-03-01 20:57 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-03-01 21:22 ` Joe Buck
2004-03-01 21:40 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-03-02 16:59 ` Alexandre Oliva
2004-03-02 17:33 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-03-02 22:54 ` Alexandre Oliva
2004-03-02 23:24 ` Daniel Berlin
2004-03-03 0:09 ` Richard Henderson
2004-03-03 0:23 ` Dale Johannesen
2004-03-03 0:33 ` Richard Henderson
2004-03-03 0:39 ` Dale Johannesen
2004-03-03 0:27 ` Alexandre Oliva
2004-03-03 0:57 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-03-03 3:53 ` Alexandre Oliva
2004-03-03 11:08 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-03-03 16:49 ` Alexandre Oliva
2004-03-03 17:34 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-03-03 18:12 ` Joe Buck
2004-03-03 19:04 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-03-03 0:52 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-03-03 1:51 ` Joe Buck
2004-03-03 11:37 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-03-01 18:45 ` Joe Buck
2004-03-01 18:56 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-03-01 19:11 ` Joe Buck
2004-03-01 19:48 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-03-01 20:09 ` Joe Buck
2004-03-01 20:37 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-03-01 18:34 ` Joe Buck
2004-02-29 7:18 ` Phil Edwards
2004-03-01 6:15 ` Kevin Atkinson
2004-03-01 8:04 ` Kevin Atkinson
2004-03-02 20:58 ` Matt Austern
2004-03-02 21:24 ` George Garvey
2004-03-03 1:21 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-03-02 23:10 ` Joe Buck
2004-03-03 0:30 ` Alexandre Oliva [this message]
2004-03-01 19:03 Cheng, Cheuk
2004-03-01 19:34 Chris Lattner
2004-03-03 0:33 Robert Dewar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=or8yiisrg6.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br \
--to=aoliva@redhat.com \
--cc=Joe.Buck@synopsys.COM \
--cc=austern@apple.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=kevina@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).