From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1E6B3858001 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 01:57:54 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org E1E6B3858001 Received: from linux-libre.fsfla.org ([209.51.188.54]:60588 helo=free.home) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lRQ7E-0003oc-Nq; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 21:57:53 -0400 Received: from livre (livre.home [172.31.160.2]) by free.home (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 12V1vc3F743938 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 30 Mar 2021 22:57:38 -0300 From: Alexandre Oliva To: JeanHeyd Meneide via Gcc Cc: Giacomo Tesio , JeanHeyd Meneide , Nathan Sidwell Subject: Re: Remove RMS from the GCC Steering Committee Organization: Free thinker, not speaking for the GNU Project References: <20210330151656.00007e20@tesio.it> Errors-To: aoliva@lxoliva.fsfla.org Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 22:57:38 -0300 In-Reply-To: (JeanHeyd Meneide via Gcc's message of "Tue, 30 Mar 2021 13:07:07 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 01:57:56 -0000 On Mar 30, 2021, JeanHeyd Meneide via Gcc wrote: > My problem is Dr. Richard M. Stallman stands credibly and > factually accused of Doxxing and GCC contributor/participant and > knowingly manipulating the project for his own personal reasons. This accusation is outright false, beyond any possible doubt. A misguided person thought that reciprocating the doxxing against RMS was a good way to defend him. It's not. The message went through because there is no censorship regime in effect. RMS asked the unacceptable post to be deleted from the archives hosted in GNU servers as soon as he learned about it. I did not check whether that was done. If you have any evidence that it wasn't, please let me know. That you got confirmation of a false claim from multiple developers you talked to should now have you doubting other of their allegations. If you look into them outside the attacking coalition, you *will* find them to be built on just as flaky foundations. -- Alexandre Oliva, happy hacker https://FSFLA.org/blogs/lxo/ Free Software Activist GNU Toolchain Engineer Vim, Vi, Voltei pro Emacs -- GNUlius Caesar