From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5657 invoked by alias); 13 Dec 2001 01:15:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5472 invoked from network); 13 Dec 2001 01:14:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.230.5) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 Dec 2001 01:14:18 -0000 Received: from fri.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br (cse.cygnus.com [205.180.230.236]) by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA08560; Wed, 12 Dec 2001 17:14:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br (free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br [192.168.160.1]) by fri.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id fBD1E7Z17449; Wed, 12 Dec 2001 23:14:07 -0200 Received: (from aoliva@localhost) by free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br (8.11.6/8.11.6) id fBD1E0j09359; Wed, 12 Dec 2001 23:14:00 -0200 X-Authentication-Warning: free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br: aoliva set sender to aoliva@redhat.com using -f To: Adrian von Bidder Cc: Adam Megacz , gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: configure option to disable building of libstdc++-v3 but not disable g++? References: <86vgfdb855.fsf@megacz.com> <1008153804.1022.0.camel@lspace> From: Alexandre Oliva Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 17:16:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: Adrian von Bidder's message of "12 Dec 2001 11:43:24 +0100" Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0805 (Gnus v5.8.5) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00680.txt.bz2 On Dec 12, 2001, Adrian von Bidder wrote: > On Wed, 2001-12-12 at 04:50, Alexandre Oliva wrote: >> On Dec 11, 2001, Adam Megacz wrote: >> >> > What option would I pass to configure to cause it to not build >> > libstdc++-v3 (without simply leaving c++ out of the --with-languages= >> > option, since I still need g++)? >> >> > I can't seem to find such an option in the manual... >> >> I'm afraid there's no such option. > But simply deleting the libstdc++-v3 subdirectory does probably get you > where you want. Good idea. Just to be clear: deleting it from (or renaming it in) the source tree should indeed get you there. Removing it from the build tree will just get it re-created. -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com} CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me