From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29507 invoked by alias); 4 Dec 2003 23:04:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29424 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2003 23:04:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Dec 2003 23:04:42 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hB4N4e210787; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 18:04:40 -0500 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hB4N4e200540; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 18:04:40 -0500 Received: from livre.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br (aoliva.cipe.redhat.com [10.0.1.10]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hB4N4dm5025000; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 18:04:40 -0500 Received: from livre.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br (livre.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br [127.0.0.1]) by livre.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hB4N4cI2010812; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 21:04:38 -0200 Received: (from aoliva@localhost) by livre.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id hB4N4cci010808; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 21:04:38 -0200 To: Paul Eggert Cc: Ben Elliston , "Zack Weinberg" , rms@gnu.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} References: <8765hf4c8z.fsf@wasabisystems.com> <87wu9mt79r.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> <871xrs5b9j.fsf@penguin.cs.ucla.edu> <87znegqb31.fsf@codesourcery.com> <87brqsw9d9.fsf@penguin.cs.ucla.edu> <871xroqlaf.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> <87n0aaj4cl.fsf@penguin.cs.ucla.edu> <87wu9esxu6.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> <87ad69rf42.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> <87y8tsx58e.fsf@codesourcery.com> <8765gwvowl.fsf@wasabisystems.com> <87r7zkb6xm.fsf@penguin.cs.ucla.edu> From: Alexandre Oliva Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 23:11:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <87r7zkb6xm.fsf@penguin.cs.ucla.edu> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00362.txt.bz2 On Dec 4, 2003, Paul Eggert wrote: > Ben Elliston writes: >> I'm convinced that the proposed change ... would have too much >> impact on users (both of Autoconf and auxillary config.* users). > OK, how about the following more-conservative change instead? I like the approach, but I think we'd be better off using solaris10 for Solaris 10/SunOS 5.10, just because then solaris* would still match. Solaris 10 is more like Solaris 2+ than SunOS 4, which most sunos* matches would get. At which point, we could probably do without the preference switches. -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org} CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer