From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25449 invoked by alias); 3 Feb 2002 02:46:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25382 invoked from network); 3 Feb 2002 02:46:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lacrosse.corp.redhat.com) (12.107.208.154) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 3 Feb 2002 02:46:43 -0000 Received: from free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br (aoliva2.cipe.redhat.com [10.0.1.156]) by lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g132kd332706; Sat, 2 Feb 2002 21:46:39 -0500 Received: (from aoliva@localhost) by free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g132kMe07722; Sun, 3 Feb 2002 00:46:22 -0200 To: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) Cc: coola@ngs.ru, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, pcarlini@unitus.it Subject: Re: a warning to implement References: <20020203020219.37B68F28F1@nile.gnat.com> From: Alexandre Oliva Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2002 18:46:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: dewar@gnat.com's message of "Sat, 2 Feb 2002 21:02:19 -0500 (EST)" Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0805 (Gnus v5.8.5) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00085.txt.bz2 On Feb 3, 2002, dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) wrote: >>> It's not clearly bogus. It's explicitly allowed in the Standard. > It is a self evident fact that *ALL* warnings are about things that are > allowed in the standard, or instead you would be posting an error message > so the above statement is a rather curious non-sequitur. I see. Point taken. I withdraw my objection. Thanks for keeping me straight :-) -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com} CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer