From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
To: Geert Bosch <bosch@gnat.com>
Cc: kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner),
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 23:19:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <orsmsg69hg.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B2B458E8-7120-11D7-B8B8-00039344BF4A@gnat.com>
On Apr 17, 2003, Geert Bosch <bosch@gnat.com> wrote:
>> Waiting to be enlightened, :-)
> Hope the example helps. Yell if not :-)
'fraid it doesn't. Only the alignment of variable Q seems to be
user-specified in this case, so it doesn't compare the two different
cases, which is the point of contention. What if the alignment of the
Point record was defined as 16 as well? What if it was defined to
something else? What if the record alignment was defined by the user
but the alignment of variable Q wasn't?
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-17 22:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 101+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-17 11:56 Richard Kenner
2003-04-17 20:35 ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-04-17 22:41 ` Geert Bosch
2003-04-17 23:19 ` Alexandre Oliva [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-23 3:29 Robert Dewar
2003-04-23 2:20 Richard Kenner
2003-04-23 5:31 ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-04-24 6:23 ` Jason Merrill
2003-04-24 8:43 ` Geert Bosch
2003-04-24 17:48 ` Jason Merrill
2003-04-24 18:04 ` Zack Weinberg
2003-04-24 19:31 ` Jason Merrill
2003-04-24 21:32 ` Geert Bosch
2003-04-24 23:24 ` Jason Merrill
2003-04-25 2:56 ` Richard Henderson
2003-04-22 15:08 Richard Kenner
2003-04-23 1:07 ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-04-22 0:15 Robert Dewar
2003-04-22 1:58 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-04-22 0:11 Robert Dewar
2003-04-22 1:35 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-04-21 21:25 Richard Kenner
2003-04-21 20:59 Richard Kenner
2003-04-21 21:14 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-04-21 20:45 Richard Kenner
2003-04-21 20:58 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-04-21 18:14 Richard Kenner
2003-04-21 20:33 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-04-21 17:25 Richard Kenner
2003-04-21 18:14 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-04-22 9:00 ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-04-20 21:28 Robert Dewar
2003-04-21 17:05 ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-04-20 21:19 Robert Dewar
2003-04-18 11:41 Richard Kenner
2003-04-18 8:06 Richard Kenner
2003-04-18 8:59 ` Richard Henderson
2003-04-17 21:41 Richard Kenner
2003-04-17 23:20 ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-04-18 1:16 ` Richard Henderson
2003-04-17 21:40 Richard Kenner
2003-04-17 10:44 Robert Dewar
2003-04-17 20:30 ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-04-17 8:12 Richard Kenner
2003-04-17 8:38 ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-04-11 22:26 Robert Dewar
2003-04-11 16:59 Robert Dewar
2003-04-11 18:49 ` Laurent Guerby
2003-04-11 16:51 Robert Dewar
2003-04-11 14:52 Robert Dewar
2003-04-11 4:45 Richard Kenner
2003-04-17 5:39 ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-04-11 0:45 Ulrich Weigand
2003-04-10 22:43 Richard Kenner
2003-04-11 0:31 ` Richard Henderson
2003-04-11 2:19 ` David Edelsohn
2003-04-10 22:23 Richard Kenner
2003-04-10 22:16 Richard Kenner
2003-04-10 22:07 Richard Kenner
2003-04-10 22:23 ` David Edelsohn
2003-04-10 22:05 Robert Dewar
2003-04-10 22:02 Richard Kenner
2003-04-10 22:24 ` Richard Henderson
2003-04-11 11:20 ` Laurent Guerby
2003-04-11 11:57 ` Arnaud Charlet
2003-04-11 14:16 ` Laurent Guerby
2003-04-10 21:56 Richard Kenner
2003-04-10 22:02 ` David Edelsohn
2003-04-10 21:45 Richard Kenner
2003-04-10 21:52 ` David Edelsohn
2003-04-10 21:57 ` Richard Henderson
2003-04-10 21:44 Richard Kenner
2003-04-10 21:32 Robert Dewar
2003-04-10 21:32 ` David Edelsohn
2003-04-10 21:31 Richard Kenner
2003-04-10 21:29 Robert Dewar
2003-04-10 21:10 Robert Dewar
2003-04-10 21:17 ` David Edelsohn
2003-04-10 21:10 Richard Kenner
2003-04-10 21:04 Richard Kenner
2003-04-10 21:41 ` Geoff Keating
2003-04-10 20:57 Robert Dewar
2003-04-10 21:07 ` Ulrich Weigand
2003-04-10 20:52 Robert Dewar
2003-04-10 20:39 Richard Kenner
2003-04-10 21:00 ` Geoff Keating
2003-04-10 21:01 ` Ulrich Weigand
2003-04-10 21:44 ` Richard Henderson
2003-04-10 20:13 Richard Kenner
2003-04-10 20:28 ` Ulrich Weigand
2003-04-10 19:20 Richard Kenner
2003-04-10 5:33 Richard Kenner
2003-04-10 7:20 ` Ulrich Weigand
2003-04-09 23:31 Ulrich Weigand
2003-04-10 2:27 ` Richard Henderson
2003-04-10 3:10 ` Ulrich Weigand
2003-04-10 16:20 ` Ulrich Weigand
2003-04-10 16:39 ` Geoff Keating
2003-04-10 16:44 ` Ulrich Weigand
2003-04-10 18:06 ` Richard Henderson
2003-04-08 17:47 Ulrich Weigand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=orsmsg69hg.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br \
--to=aoliva@redhat.com \
--cc=bosch@gnat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).