From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
To: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Joern Rennecke <amylaar@redhat.com>,
torvalds@transmeta.com (Linus Torvalds),
dewar@gnat.com, moshier@moshier.ne.mediaone.net, gcc@gcc.gnu.org,
tprince@computer.org
Subject: Re: What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative law in combine)
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 19:34:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ory9p5akuh.fsf@feijoada.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <flk80p96g1.fsf@jambon.cmla.ens-cachan.fr>
On Jul 30, 2001, Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> I'm puzzled to see "optimization" used to designate a transformation
> applying dubious rules to transmute the meaning of a computation :-(
In what sense is this different from Fortran's rules on parentheses?
I'm just trying to bring in the same rule to C, given the additional
complexities brought in by the preprocessor mentioned by Linus.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-07-30 19:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 116+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-07-29 14:22 dewar
2001-07-29 21:33 ` What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative law incombine) Linus Torvalds
2001-07-30 14:43 ` What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative law in combine) Alexandre Oliva
2001-07-30 15:45 ` Neil Booth
2001-07-30 16:03 ` Alexandre Oliva
2001-07-30 16:11 ` Neil Booth
2001-07-30 16:28 ` Alexandre Oliva
2001-07-30 19:08 ` Joern Rennecke
2001-07-30 19:22 ` Alexandre Oliva
2001-07-30 19:29 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2001-07-30 19:34 ` Alexandre Oliva [this message]
2001-07-30 19:54 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2001-07-30 21:31 ` What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative law incombine) Mark Mitchell
2001-07-30 19:27 ` What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative law in combine) Gabriel Dos Reis
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-08-03 14:48 dewar
2001-08-02 3:37 Vincent Penquerc'h
2001-08-01 19:04 Carlo Wood
2001-08-01 12:06 Phil Edwards
2001-08-01 10:39 dewar
2001-08-01 10:38 dewar
2001-08-01 10:13 dewar
2001-08-01 10:05 dewar
2001-08-01 10:04 dewar
2001-08-01 10:28 ` Gabriel Dos_Reis
2001-08-01 9:59 dewar
2001-08-01 9:58 What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative law incombine) Gabriel Dos_Reis
2001-08-01 10:08 ` Wolfgang Bangerth
2001-08-01 11:12 ` Gabriel Dos_Reis
2001-08-01 11:27 ` What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative law in combine) Theodore Papadopoulo
2001-08-01 11:47 ` Gabriel Dos_Reis
2001-08-03 7:32 ` Nick Ing-Simmons
2001-08-03 6:01 ` Per Abrahamsen
2001-08-01 6:52 dewar
2001-08-01 6:04 dewar
2001-08-01 6:48 ` Vincent Penquerc'h
2001-08-03 0:46 ` Eric W. Biederman
2001-08-01 3:02 Vincent Penquerc'h
2001-07-31 19:10 dewar
2001-07-31 18:23 dewar
2001-07-31 18:20 dewar
2001-07-31 18:50 ` Joern Rennecke
2001-07-31 21:27 ` Tim Prince
2001-07-31 18:15 dewar
2001-07-31 18:12 What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative law incombine) Linus Torvalds
2001-07-31 20:55 ` What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative law in combine) Gabriel Dos Reis
2001-07-31 17:37 dewar
2001-07-31 16:38 dewar
2001-07-31 9:22 mike stump
2001-07-31 8:37 dewar
2001-07-31 8:36 mike stump
2001-07-31 8:36 dewar
2001-07-31 8:35 dewar
2001-07-31 8:19 mike stump
2001-07-31 7:59 mike stump
2001-07-31 7:26 dewar
2001-07-31 15:57 ` Toon Moene
2001-07-31 21:55 ` Tim Prince
2001-08-03 6:12 ` Per Abrahamsen
2001-07-30 21:13 dewar
2001-07-30 21:34 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2001-07-30 21:43 ` Joern Rennecke
2001-07-30 21:53 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2001-08-03 7:12 ` Nick Ing-Simmons
2001-08-01 8:55 ` Theodore Papadopoulo
2001-08-01 9:15 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2001-08-01 11:21 ` Theodore Papadopoulo
2001-08-01 11:44 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2001-08-01 9:24 ` Tim Hollebeek
2001-08-01 9:54 ` What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative law incombine) Linus Torvalds
2001-08-01 10:26 ` Gabriel Dos_Reis
2001-08-01 11:13 ` What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative law in combine) Alexandre Oliva
2001-08-01 11:36 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2001-08-01 12:07 ` Alexandre Oliva
2001-08-01 13:21 ` Gabriel Dos_Reis
2001-08-01 14:20 ` Toon Moene
2001-07-30 20:54 dewar
2001-07-30 21:11 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2001-07-30 21:39 ` Joern Rennecke
2001-07-30 19:46 dewar
2001-07-30 20:00 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2001-07-30 20:20 ` Alexandre Oliva
2001-07-30 20:25 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2001-07-30 18:39 dewar
2001-07-30 18:38 dewar
2001-07-30 18:08 dewar
2001-07-30 18:02 dewar
2001-07-30 18:00 dewar
2001-07-30 18:25 ` Joe Buck
2001-07-30 16:11 dewar
2001-07-30 16:29 ` Alexandre Oliva
2001-07-31 8:13 ` Kevin Handy
2001-07-30 15:29 dewar
2001-07-30 15:39 ` Toon Moene
2001-07-30 13:10 dewar
2001-07-30 12:26 dewar
2001-07-30 11:52 dewar
2001-07-30 11:37 What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative law incombine) Linus Torvalds
2001-07-30 11:53 ` What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative law in combine) Gabriel Dos Reis
2001-07-30 18:40 ` Olivier Galibert
2001-07-30 19:06 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2001-07-31 1:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-07-31 2:04 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2001-07-31 2:35 ` Olivier Galibert
2001-07-31 2:58 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2001-07-31 18:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-07-30 8:59 mike stump
2001-07-30 6:14 dewar
2001-07-30 8:30 ` Kevin Handy
2001-07-30 6:01 dewar
2001-07-30 6:53 ` Tim Hollebeek
2001-07-30 6:00 dewar
2001-07-30 13:08 ` Toon Moene
2001-07-30 5:57 dewar
2001-07-29 12:52 * Re: What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative lawin combine) Linus Torvalds
2001-07-29 14:03 ` What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative law incombine) Stephen L Moshier
2001-07-29 21:17 ` What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative law in combine) Fergus Henderson
2001-07-30 0:23 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2001-07-17 15:59 associative law in combine Joern Rennecke
2001-07-18 1:01 ` Toon Moene
2001-07-18 1:47 ` What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative law in combine) Jan Hubicka
2001-07-28 23:04 ` Tim Prince
2001-07-29 6:33 ` Jan Hubicka
2001-07-29 10:18 ` Tim Prince
2001-07-29 10:26 ` Jan Hubicka
2001-07-29 12:11 ` Tim Prince
2001-07-29 12:17 ` Jan Hubicka
2001-07-29 10:50 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ory9p5akuh.fsf@feijoada.lsd.ic.unicamp.br \
--to=aoliva@redhat.com \
--cc=amylaar@redhat.com \
--cc=dewar@gnat.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gdr@codesourcery.com \
--cc=moshier@moshier.ne.mediaone.net \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
--cc=tprince@computer.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).