From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [IPv6:2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08BD83858005 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 17:48:43 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 08BD83858005 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.cz Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 08BD83858005 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:1 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1704995324; cv=none; b=o9KEIGm4XpxdsJ+rmJEowbt8p6SX6e5zJVwWDU+QUWfFFC4Q5wEk9331GecqPNnZDdGs1L4Y3Xu9tLtby1hpB961ykAnb5UNnwMrIYfaiOnvkiXqzRdPgKU5rrlWlPiE9ZAg4R+/HIYvBMX4aGXBw3MPSnXdHSfL7qR05IOzX1Q= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1704995324; c=relaxed/simple; bh=D7gemQKsKhkX9P93gLNLce0iP8veq4+UfnvrxXTEYac=; h=DKIM-Signature:DKIM-Signature:DKIM-Signature:DKIM-Signature:From: To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=YaModS5pe/v2i2sVyLeRYtvUanOyPCm3nhJq5da25iObBbQNmP3N7F36wruc5IBAAqjJRFlbMBeYKLIZf18fH+tmlcrIEf44CqAlrPgjFUiHL0T2MM4GCoy8bZxZT4XmBADq8oLHoy0+e+V3nYd2gZxT8E94PkjJ744aK0/BN10= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [IPv6:2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2541220D9; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 17:48:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1704995321; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=f1OttG3M0RVF7u2UuTDe58t62I4Vf82sD/Sc/CysYCg=; b=IPrPxqBeOsVW8XxtDAjE+La3qch26QuU+79DVuCBQtbFsP8olkIg1xrfLerZbgY8n64niU EnJJG2xu9VNk0VdT6jJS+d+7crc4mLmNPM07pCYtQ2A+iIBrmr2fc1ZGYfaV5wIbeWQS9S K8EIiv8sWGUUNtQu3zuVepi5BmOyYx8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1704995321; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=f1OttG3M0RVF7u2UuTDe58t62I4Vf82sD/Sc/CysYCg=; b=EiS79agdGR0x45uAoERvfrIKwfjWODZHGuylCyW3/u3Zi5zm4KCLjCO8I5ZIxvjclVriIt AfeL0Zfyx356PECQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1704995321; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=f1OttG3M0RVF7u2UuTDe58t62I4Vf82sD/Sc/CysYCg=; b=IPrPxqBeOsVW8XxtDAjE+La3qch26QuU+79DVuCBQtbFsP8olkIg1xrfLerZbgY8n64niU EnJJG2xu9VNk0VdT6jJS+d+7crc4mLmNPM07pCYtQ2A+iIBrmr2fc1ZGYfaV5wIbeWQS9S K8EIiv8sWGUUNtQu3zuVepi5BmOyYx8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1704995321; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=f1OttG3M0RVF7u2UuTDe58t62I4Vf82sD/Sc/CysYCg=; b=EiS79agdGR0x45uAoERvfrIKwfjWODZHGuylCyW3/u3Zi5zm4KCLjCO8I5ZIxvjclVriIt AfeL0Zfyx356PECQ== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BB9C13635; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 17:48:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id Msj/JfkpoGXybAAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Thu, 11 Jan 2024 17:48:41 +0000 From: Martin Jambor To: Jason Merrill Cc: GCC Mailing List Subject: Re: lambda coding style In-Reply-To: <7b2c4b10-4134-4f1b-9597-de66d6072f16@redhat.com> References: <7b2c4b10-4134-4f1b-9597-de66d6072f16@redhat.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.38.1 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/29.1 (x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 18:48:41 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Level: X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=IPrPxqBe; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=EiS79agd X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd2.dmz-prg2.suse.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.69 / 50.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; SPAMHAUS_XBL(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97:from]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[suse.cz:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; INVALID_MSGID(1.70)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; BAYES_HAM(-0.00)[24.32%]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-Spam-Score: 0.69 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: A2541220D9 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,INVALID_MSGID,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Hi, On Wed, Jan 10 2024, Jason Merrill via Gcc wrote: > What formatting style do we want for non-trivial lambdas in GCC sources? > I'm thinking the most consistent choice would be > > auto l = [&] (parms) // space between ] ( > { // brace on new line, indented two spaces > return stuff; > }; > > By default, recent emacs lines up the { with the previous line, like an > in-class function definition; I talked it into the above indentation with > > (defun lambda-offset (elem) > (if (assq 'inline-open c-syntactic-context) '+ 0)) > (add-to-hook 'c++-mode-hook '(c-set-offset 'inlambda 'lambda-offset)) Is this really add-to-hook and not add-hook? Thanks! Martin > > I think we probably want the same formatting for lambdas in function > argument lists, e.g. > > algorithm ([] (parms) > { > return foo; > }); > > Any other opinions? > > Jason