From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <mjambor@suse.cz>
Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.220.29])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B9E93858407
 for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 17:01:47 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 6B9E93858407
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org;
 dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.cz
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz
Received: from relay2.suse.de (relay2.suse.de [149.44.160.134])
 by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 449701F388;
 Tue, 22 Mar 2022 17:01:46 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa;
 t=1647968506; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:
 mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
 bh=Cfrj5uq/Xo9Rt7A4FamJi5qtU3uQfBrT+CQMBB8tejs=;
 b=2B3jOT/kPHuMHxf2larPQVIaaFkMKIqUZmFrxr+uiNYzdOkjB7gguAppIs8LoEa2S9FdXp
 6Uq9dwChLYpReYp/mQWhDUeCY/d0hoFm6KXl/rF+WkRYxKdhesFha65kNZoB/mvo7arpjl
 ftcV08XsT6xuIpx5EnTLGTv9LrefYCo=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz;
 s=susede2_ed25519; t=1647968506;
 h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:
 mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
 bh=Cfrj5uq/Xo9Rt7A4FamJi5qtU3uQfBrT+CQMBB8tejs=;
 b=V2UIArqPCGV6uzThhShpiTOLPv3vtiSuMA73ZFVF52GnlaG6f15A9EE4umog84e97438aR
 VMkmtcyjCpQCWOAQ==
Received: from suse.cz (virgil.suse.cz [10.100.13.50])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by relay2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C4E5A3B87;
 Tue, 22 Mar 2022 17:01:46 +0000 (UTC)
From: Martin Jambor <mjambor@suse.cz>
To: Krishna Narayanan <krishnanarayanan132002@gmail.com>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: GSoC: cp demangle non recursive
In-Reply-To: <CABhGnjtedMm+sL2_1QOHyd_+mq+O8hw=csQQSQ76_hkzah190w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABhGnjtedMm+sL2_1QOHyd_+mq+O8hw=csQQSQ76_hkzah190w@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.35 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/27.2
 (x86_64-suse-linux-gnu)
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 18:01:46 +0100
Message-ID: <ri6bkxxyl8l.fsf@suse.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP,
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc mailing list <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc>,
 <mailto:gcc-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc>,
 <mailto:gcc-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 17:01:48 -0000

Hello,

On Sat, Mar 19 2022, Krishna Narayanan wrote:
> Hello,
> I have a doubt regarding the recursion part in demangle.c, what should
> be the expected report when the recursion limit has been
> reached,

Look at the comment of the d_demangle function.  In the new scheme of
things, the failure would essentially be a memory allocation failure.  

> Secondly the verbose which has to be printed for the C
> linkage, what should be the info that has to be displayed.

I'm not sure I understand, but the demangler should have exactly the
same output as now, only the internal implementation should change.

Good luck,

Martin