From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [IPv6:2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8137D3858D38 for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 11:28:35 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 8137D3858D38 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.cz Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 8137D3858D38 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:1 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1712921317; cv=none; b=OjP2PqgsUWAUxxSgPalcIoFpWP3KY915nBTE2EQ7QjlhtJXw203YWvANlj3SMzlyDzuh0FTMHiq0kDhWCyxAnx39kRJWd3d0zGUHVtQi0lI4pnPQkyGFHJOW7pXQQEauu/gIT17s9kUKhbdPjGPW+sOw0Jn1p1vpe0KQ281yws0= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1712921317; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+jh8PQ9ODlgD/WANNyiR0FmkUKvftKd4xijTjzWrSn0=; h=DKIM-Signature:DKIM-Signature:DKIM-Signature:DKIM-Signature:From: To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=T3PqEJdV6pJJkHTGuB8A99D+347lfe3z0mreMj9j2B4uQsIimrkL94Nk6XAbSVQj+8pDUT3cBA1o3BRxk6Ga2jYnGOKtxQIfu+448vD4fJK31yYP47DJRpJSFb2VDyVSOwJ0hjPssnJfKtc07dOuMgAdRTkSttQNVrBFAAD3E2A= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [10.150.64.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C121381FB; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 11:28:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1712921314; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=+jh8PQ9ODlgD/WANNyiR0FmkUKvftKd4xijTjzWrSn0=; b=aoFTsM0X0xQxVs0/s0GgHkBqUFJ0/W+AO4a8vnuXY+Nw5Zl5tx5jjnWaowBKGK0Azahb5C 01hG5Cq7KHkLZm119r0PknIW/OHqYJlD07OX1U04MpqXjckMLOOOKecKJ5p1jvA6G1tYNO K6Y68u72zXdaL4sPQWrUiT4jAdpxaVE= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1712921314; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=+jh8PQ9ODlgD/WANNyiR0FmkUKvftKd4xijTjzWrSn0=; b=6SNYDuhpjXEw+l+s6bmg5KUf1ZPdCsghMpZUxxLoypn82KEj2jm1FhAnXStVREj9Ty3+CZ arwY5xG4eOwEE6Dw== Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1712921314; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=+jh8PQ9ODlgD/WANNyiR0FmkUKvftKd4xijTjzWrSn0=; b=aoFTsM0X0xQxVs0/s0GgHkBqUFJ0/W+AO4a8vnuXY+Nw5Zl5tx5jjnWaowBKGK0Azahb5C 01hG5Cq7KHkLZm119r0PknIW/OHqYJlD07OX1U04MpqXjckMLOOOKecKJ5p1jvA6G1tYNO K6Y68u72zXdaL4sPQWrUiT4jAdpxaVE= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1712921314; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=+jh8PQ9ODlgD/WANNyiR0FmkUKvftKd4xijTjzWrSn0=; b=6SNYDuhpjXEw+l+s6bmg5KUf1ZPdCsghMpZUxxLoypn82KEj2jm1FhAnXStVREj9Ty3+CZ arwY5xG4eOwEE6Dw== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95E0513942; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 11:28:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id hUaOJOIaGWZaOAAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Fri, 12 Apr 2024 11:28:34 +0000 From: Martin Jambor To: Vedant5432 , gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: RE: Project Selection Process and Timeline for GSoC 2024 In-Reply-To: References: User-Agent: Notmuch/0.38.2 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/29.3 (x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 13:28:34 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Level: X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.85 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-2.55)[98.01%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com,gcc.gnu.org]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROMTLD(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FREEMAIL_ENVRCPT(0.00)[gmail.com]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo,imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:rdns] X-Spam-Score: -3.85 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Hello, On Fri, Apr 05 2024, Vedant5432 via Gcc wrote: > Hello, > I am a potential contributor for GSoC 2024, I made a submission for the > project Extend the Static Analysis Pass, I was wondering about the process > of ranking the proposals and the general timelines when the applicants will > be notified if their proposals will be considered potentially? We are diligently evaluating all GSoC proposals including and will finish doing so by the deadline set by Google. Google reserves the right to announce the acceptance themselves - and they have they final say when they determine the number of slots an organization receives - therefore we cannot publicly disclose much details about the evaluation process, I am afraid. > Would using > Zulip be the best form of communication for faster responses compared to > email? Only for gcc-rust related issues/topics/discussions. Sorry that we cannot disclose much at this point. Martin