From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Love To: egcs@cygnus.com Subject: Re: libf2c FLAGS_TO_PASS [was Re: egcs-1.2 stuff ] Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 13:25:00 -0000 Message-id: References: <12195.924063552@upchuck> X-SW-Source: 1999-04/msg00506.html >>>>> "Jeff" == Jeffrey A Law writes: >> >I don't have HJ's patch to look >> >at, but if it does just what the ChangeLog says it does, I think it's >> >the Right Thing. You are very wise. It doesn't. [FWIW, IIRC there was a good historical reason for the exact quoting used from the days of GCC 2.5 or 2.6, so people have had a good chance to complain.] >> Okay, that's all I need to hear...I approve it! Won't commit it >> tonight, probably, so if Jeff or someone has it handy, they can go >> ahead...otherwise I'll dig it out soon and apply it myself. If you don't believe what I said before and don't want my ossifying fix, please read the Makefile. Or actually try on the config.status target. [It's surely clear that RUNTESTFLAGS is irrelevant to libf2c, at best a fossil.] PICFLAG might also get attention depending on whether someone can explain it or not. Jeff> I don't have the patch handy. Jeff> I'd go groping through the archives myself, but the subject on Jeff> this thread hasn't been well suited to searching for specific Jeff> patches until now :-) Thanks for changing the Subject: off a thread I killed. Jeff> HJ, if you have the patch handy and send it, I will install it. Jeff> Else I'll wait for Craig to find it. Sigh. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Love To: egcs@cygnus.com Subject: Re: libf2c FLAGS_TO_PASS [was Re: egcs-1.2 stuff ] Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 23:15:00 -0000 Message-ID: References: <12195.924063552@upchuck> X-SW-Source: 1999-04n/msg00510.html Message-ID: <19990430231500.xeLbwIhRB7uPltPD2eX1I5Pl_7O33OIJHF5Xf90QSrg@z> >>>>> "Jeff" == Jeffrey A Law writes: >> >I don't have HJ's patch to look >> >at, but if it does just what the ChangeLog says it does, I think it's >> >the Right Thing. You are very wise. It doesn't. [FWIW, IIRC there was a good historical reason for the exact quoting used from the days of GCC 2.5 or 2.6, so people have had a good chance to complain.] >> Okay, that's all I need to hear...I approve it! Won't commit it >> tonight, probably, so if Jeff or someone has it handy, they can go >> ahead...otherwise I'll dig it out soon and apply it myself. If you don't believe what I said before and don't want my ossifying fix, please read the Makefile. Or actually try on the config.status target. [It's surely clear that RUNTESTFLAGS is irrelevant to libf2c, at best a fossil.] PICFLAG might also get attention depending on whether someone can explain it or not. Jeff> I don't have the patch handy. Jeff> I'd go groping through the archives myself, but the subject on Jeff> this thread hasn't been well suited to searching for specific Jeff> patches until now :-) Thanks for changing the Subject: off a thread I killed. Jeff> HJ, if you have the patch handy and send it, I will install it. Jeff> Else I'll wait for Craig to find it. Sigh.