From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ciao.gmane.io (ciao.gmane.io [116.202.254.214]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BD3B385800C for ; Tue, 6 Jun 2023 08:31:37 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 6BD3B385800C Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=westcontrol.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=m.gmane-mx.org Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1q6S6K-0001eO-1H for gcc@gcc.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Jun 2023 10:31:36 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org From: David Brown Subject: Re: Will GCC eventually learn to use BSR or even TZCNT on AMD/Intel processors? Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2023 10:31:30 +0200 Message-ID: References: <5982A5DF4D694B4EA971B2597E833FC6@H270> <5fe1271b-18f5-6faa-d48d-669c87bbd893@gmail.com> <20230605172357.26fd016cc091c350facb1cec@killthe.net> <7e12a44b-6525-c7e1-9d53-786206ee9719@gmail.com> <20230605190942.bf8c6a8156005dd0fa142c09@killthe.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.9.0 Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: <20230605190942.bf8c6a8156005dd0fa142c09@killthe.net> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On 06/06/2023 02:09, Dave Blanchard wrote: > > If this guy's threads are such a terrible waste of your time, how > about employing your email client's filters to ignore his posts (and > mine too) and fuck off? > You apparently appreciate Stefan's posts, but burst a blood vessel when reading anyone else's. And Stefan has shown a total disregard for what anyone else writes. Rather than everyone else having to killfile the pair of you, why don't you do everyone a favour and have your little rants with each other directly, and not on this list? If either of you are remotely interested in improving gcc's optimisation, there are two things you must do: 1. Stop wasting the developers' time and driving them up the wall, so that they have more time to work on improving the tools. 2. Make the suggestions and requests for improvements through the proper channels - polite, factual and detailed bug reports. This is not rocket science - it's basic human decency, and should not be difficult to understand. David