From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16879 invoked by alias); 15 Apr 2002 18:56:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16845 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2002 18:56:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO Cantor.suse.de) (213.95.15.193) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 15 Apr 2002 18:56:22 -0000 Received: from Hermes.suse.de (Charybdis.suse.de [213.95.15.201]) by Cantor.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D4391E8E3; Mon, 15 Apr 2002 20:56:22 +0200 (MEST) Received: from aj by arthur.inka.de with local (Exim 3.34 #1) id 16xBeG-0003OE-00; Mon, 15 Apr 2002 20:56:20 +0200 Mail-Copies-To: never To: Mark Mitchell Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: GCC 3.1 Release References: <46690000.1018660657@gandalf.codesourcery.com> From: Andreas Jaeger Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 12:00:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <46690000.1018660657@gandalf.codesourcery.com> (Mark Mitchell's message of "Fri, 12 Apr 2002 18:17:37 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) XEmacs/21.4 (Artificial Intelligence, i386-suse-linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00621.txt.bz2 Mark Mitchell writes: [...] > I have a proposal before the SC to slip the GCC 3.2 schedule even > further; so that the first phase of GCC 3.2 development will now end > one month beyond the release of GCC 3.1 -- June 1st -- pushing the > GCC 3.2 release date back to October 1st so as to give people time to > work on major changes for GCC 3.2 *after* GCC 3.1 is released. This means 5 month for GCC 3.2 after GCC 3.1 is released? I though we had a 6 month cycle - and the point was to *extend* the period not to shorten it, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger SuSE Labs aj@suse.de private aj@arthur.inka.de http://www.suse.de/~aj