From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-61183-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 1579 invoked by alias); 7 Oct 2002 04:49:35 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 1572 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2002 04:49:34 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO Cantor.suse.de) (213.95.15.193)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 Oct 2002 04:49:34 -0000
Received: from Hermes.suse.de (Charybdis.suse.de [213.95.15.201])
	by Cantor.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id ED7C4142C7; Mon,  7 Oct 2002 06:49:33 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from aj by arthur.inka.de with local (Exim 3.34 #1)
	id 17yPpk-0003xk-00; Mon, 07 Oct 2002 06:49:32 +0200
Mail-Copies-To: never
To: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
Cc: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>,
	Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com>,
	Diego Novillo <dnovillo@redhat.com>, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Reverting Mark's cp patch (Was: Re: [basic-improvements] bootstrap
 failure on x86)
References: <20021003165501.GA16287@tornado.toronto.redhat.com>
	<20021004195202.GH6379@codesourcery.com>
	<20021004201405.GA30675@tornado.toronto.redhat.com>
	<20021006184648.GB1252@codesourcery.com>
	<m3ptun763o.fsf@soliton.integrable-solutions.net>
	<20021006203925.GD25875@redhat.com>
From: Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2002 04:58:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <20021006203925.GD25875@redhat.com> (Richard Henderson's
 message of "Sun, 6 Oct 2002 13:39:25 -0700")
Message-ID: <u8bs66q2eb.fsf_-_@gromit.moeb>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) XEmacs/21.4 (Artificial
 Intelligence, i386-suse-linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00407.txt.bz2

Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> writes:

> On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 08:52:11PM +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
>> More accurately, it is the front-end that is broken.  We need approval
>> from another global-write privs maintainer to back out Mark's recent
>> patch. 
>
> I was hoping that one of the other C++ folks would be able
> to look at the failure and figure out what was wrong with
> the small patch.
>
> Technically Mark's got like 12 hours left on the 48 to 
> fix the patch before auto-reversion, but it sounds like he
> hasn't checked in since he left on his trip.  I guess it's
> probably best to go ahead and revert the thing now so that
> folks can get work done.

Gaby, Richard,

Can either of you revert the patch, please ?

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger
  SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
   private aj@arthur.inka.de
    http://www.suse.de/~aj