Nathanael Nerode writes: > Andreas Jaeger wrote: >> Nathanael Nerode writes: >> Unfortunately exact enough - but too late. I'd prefer to have >> libgfortran earlier multi-libbed if possible so that it can get better >> tested. >> So, what needs to be done to get this multi-libbed? I tried copying >> some stuff from libstdc++-v3 and failed with automake problems :-( >> Andreas > > The current multilibbing scheme is demented, in my opinion. I still > recommend not multilibbing at the moment; when multilibbing is moved > to the top level, you'll have to rip all the multilib code back *out* > of gfortran. You can still test gfortran with each individual library I see. > configuration directly, you know, right? No, I don't know how I can build on x86_64 a 32-bit multilib directly. Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, 90429 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126