C++ ABI?

C++ ABI?

[Tom Horsley]

OK, I give up! The gcc 3.2 release trumpets its compatibility with the
so-called C++ ABI, yet the http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.2/c++-abi.html web page
says ABSOLUTELY NOTHING about what the C++ ABI is, who defined it, where to
get a copy of it, how to read about it, etc.

I have never managed to turn up anything in any web search for this mythical
document other than references to its existance. The document itself seems
to be shrouded in absolute secrecy.

Help! Can anyone point me to this thing? Thanks.

Re: C++ ABI?

[David Edelsohn]

>>>>> Tom Horsley writes:

Tom> OK, I give up! The gcc 3.2 release trumpets its compatibility with the
Tom> so-called C++ ABI, yet the http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.2/c++-abi.html web page
Tom> says ABSOLUTELY NOTHING about what the C++ ABI is, who defined it, where to
Tom> get a copy of it, how to read about it, etc.

Tom> Help! Can anyone point me to this thing? Thanks.

	http://www.codesourcery.com/cxx-abi/

Re: C++ ABI?

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 04:24:48PM +0000, Tom Horsley wrote:
> OK, I give up! The gcc 3.2 release trumpets its compatibility with the
> so-called C++ ABI, yet the http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.2/c++-abi.html web page
> says ABSOLUTELY NOTHING about what the C++ ABI is, who defined it, where to
> get a copy of it, how to read about it, etc.
> 
> I have never managed to turn up anything in any web search for this mythical
> document other than references to its existance. The document itself seems
> to be shrouded in absolute secrecy.
> 
> Help! Can anyone point me to this thing? Thanks.

That page does need a link to it.

gcc.gnu.org -> Further Readings -> The V3 multi-vendor standard ABI
  http://www.codesourcery.com/cxx-abi/


-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer

Re: C++ ABI?

[Andreas Jaeger]

Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> writes:

> On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 04:24:48PM +0000, Tom Horsley wrote:
>> OK, I give up! The gcc 3.2 release trumpets its compatibility with the
>> so-called C++ ABI, yet the http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.2/c++-abi.html web page
>> says ABSOLUTELY NOTHING about what the C++ ABI is, who defined it, where to
>> get a copy of it, how to read about it, etc.
>> 
>> I have never managed to turn up anything in any web search for this mythical
>> document other than references to its existance. The document itself seems
>> to be shrouded in absolute secrecy.
>> 
>> Help! Can anyone point me to this thing? Thanks.
>
> That page does need a link to it.

Please send a patch for the page,

> gcc.gnu.org -> Further Readings -> The V3 multi-vendor standard ABI
>   http://www.codesourcery.com/cxx-abi/

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger
  SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
   private aj@arthur.inka.de
    http://www.suse.de/~aj

PATCH for Re: C++ ABI?

[Gerald Pfeifer]

On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>>> OK, I give up! The gcc 3.2 release trumpets its compatibility with the
>>> so-called C++ ABI, yet the http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.2/c++-abi.html web page
>>> says ABSOLUTELY NOTHING about what the C++ ABI is, who defined it, where to
>>> get a copy of it, how to read about it, etc.
> Please send a patch for the page,

It seems nobody has dealt with this yet, so I have committed the patch
below.

Gerald

Index: c++-abi.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-3.2/c++-abi.html,v
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -3 -p -r1.3 c++-abi.html
--- c++-abi.html	15 Aug 2002 17:28:13 -0000	1.3
+++ c++-abi.html	11 Sep 2002 14:31:44 -0000
@@ -8,7 +8,10 @@

     <p>
     The main point of the GCC 3.2 release is to have a relatively
-    stable and common C++ ABI for GNU/Linux and BSD usage.
+    stable and common C++ ABI for GNU/Linux and BSD usage, following
+    the documentation at
+    <a href="http://www.codesourcery.com/cxx-abi/">http://www.codesourcery.com/cxx-abi/</a>.
+
     Unfortunately this means that GCC 3.2 is incompatible with GCC 3.0
     and GCC 3.1 releases.</p>

Re: C++ ABI?

[Phil Edwards]

On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 12:45:50PM -0400, Horsley Tom wrote:
> > gcc.gnu.org -> Further Readings -> The V3 multi-vendor standard ABI
> >   http://www.codesourcery.com/cxx-abi/
> 
> OK, I've been there before, but everything I can see on that page
> seems to be Itanium related. If there are pointers to architecture
> neutral (or even IA32 specific) ABI info on that page,
> I can't see it.

Anything labeled gABI is "general ABI," anything labeled psABI is
"processor-specific" ABI.  It's a general approah, and Itanium "just happens"
to use it as its native ABI.

Phil

-- 
I would therefore like to posit that computing's central challenge, viz. "How
not to make a mess of it," has /not/ been met.
                                                 - Edsger Dijkstra, 1930-2002

Re: C++ ABI?

[David S. Miller]

   From: Horsley Tom <Tom.Horsley@ccur.com>
   Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 12:45:50 -0400
   
   OK, I've been there before, but everything I can see on that page
   seems to be Itanium related.

It was created for the sake of Itanium, but it is a generic standard.

RE: C++ ABI?

[Horsley Tom]

> gcc.gnu.org -> Further Readings -> The V3 multi-vendor standard ABI
>   http://www.codesourcery.com/cxx-abi/

OK, I've been there before, but everything I can see on that page
seems to be Itanium related. If there are pointers to architecture
neutral (or even IA32 specific) ABI info on that page,
I can't see it.

Perhaps I need to memorize everything that all the links point
at before the big picture becomes clear to me :-).