From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-65293-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 31220 invoked by alias); 27 Dec 2002 18:55:26 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 31212 invoked from network); 27 Dec 2002 18:55:24 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO Cantor.suse.de) (213.95.15.193)
  by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 27 Dec 2002 18:55:24 -0000
Received: from Hermes.suse.de (Hermes.suse.de [213.95.15.136])
	by Cantor.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id EFACA145C4; Fri, 27 Dec 2002 19:54:24 +0100 (MET)
Received: from aj by arthur.inka.de with local (Exim 3.34 #1)
	id 18Rzcl-0008MR-00; Fri, 27 Dec 2002 19:54:23 +0100
Mail-Copies-To: never
To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo@redhat.com>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2002-12-26
References: <20021227015142.GA31216@tornado.toronto.redhat.com>
	<u8isxfn6x2.fsf@gromit.moeb>
	<20021227154502.GC2688@tornado.toronto.redhat.com>
From: Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 12:16:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <20021227154502.GC2688@tornado.toronto.redhat.com> (Diego
 Novillo's message of "Fri, 27 Dec 2002 10:45:02 -0500")
Message-ID: <u8smwjl2ch.fsf@gromit.moeb>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) XEmacs/21.4 (Artificial
 Intelligence, i386-suse-linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg01467.txt.bz2

Diego Novillo <dnovillo@redhat.com> writes:

> On Fri, 27 Dec 2002, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>
>> Diego Novillo <dnovillo@redhat.com> writes:
>> 
>> > Bootstrapped and tested x86 and ppc.
>> 
>> Unfortunatly it fails for me right now on i686-linux-gnu with:
>> 
> Is this on athlon?  Very strange.  Both SPEC95 and SPEC2000
> testers bootstrapped fine with yesterday's merge.

Yes, it's on an athlon.

> I see that you added 'rtl' to --enable-checking.  Could that be
> the difference?  I configured with the default flags.

I don't know.  I just tried again and now everything works.  I'll
check some more tomorrow.  For now I suggest to close this issue until
I can reproduce it myself again.

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger
  SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
   private aj@arthur.inka.de
    http://www.suse.de/~aj