From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Merrill To: Robert Lipe Cc: law@cygnus.com, egcs@cygnus.com Subject: Re: 1008 segfaults in genattr Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 00:22:00 -0000 Message-id: References: <19971117162101.41289@dgii.com> <14025.879923259.cygnus.egcs@hurl.cygnus.com> <19971120001623.46688@dgii.com> X-SW-Source: 1997-11/msg00663.html >>>>> Robert Lipe writes: >> I refuse to accept disabling HAVE_ATEXIT until someone can explain why it's >> a problem. So far the explanations haven't cut it. > OK. Between the explanations in this thread and the ones under the > titles of related unixware and openserver problems, I don't know any > better how to better explain it. Yes, perhaps I'm still missing the > Real Problem, but losing HAVE_ATEXIT seems to make life better for some > cases. It seems to make life better for a Lot cases under Unixware. Unfortunately, that's a workaround, not an explanation. I'm not comfortable just putting in a change that fixes a problem without anyone knowing why it works. > If we're masking some other problem, and you refuse to accept this, > we're going to have to roll up our sleeves and understand it. Yep, that's what I had in mind. > What do you need? A disassembly of binary compiled with a > "HAVE_ATEXIT" compiler that fails p2732b.C? That would be a good start, thanks. > I've included stack backtraces, disassemblies, and objdump output > in previous threads. I guess I'll go back and look for them. Jason