public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: egcs-971201: testsuite results for i586-pc-linux-gnulibc1
       [not found] <199712030125.RAA06256.cygnus.egcs@kankakee.wrs.com>
@ 1997-12-02 21:12 ` Jason Merrill
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jason Merrill @ 1997-12-02 21:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mike Stump, egcs

>>>>> Mike Stump <mrs@wrs.com> writes:

> Ok, I already mentioned the fix for the g++.jason/destruct3.C problem,
> it is really safe, I think it should be included in the release.

Sorry I overlooked it for so long.  I've put it into the trunk, but it's
not critical enough for the release at this point.

Jason

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: egcs-971201: testsuite results for i586-pc-linux-gnulibc1
@ 1997-12-02 18:18 Mike Stump
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mike Stump @ 1997-12-02 18:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: egcs

> Date: Tue, 2 Dec 1997 16:34:57 +0100
> From: Max Lawson <mlawson@drfmc.ceng.cea.fr>
> To: egcs@cygnus.com

> 	Here are the results for the last snapshot.

> XPASS: g++.jason/destruct3.C - (test for bogus messages, line 38)
> XPASS: g++.mike/dyncast1.C  Execution test
> XPASS: g++.mike/dyncast2.C  Execution test

Ok, I already mentioned the fix for the g++.jason/destruct3.C problem,
it is really safe, I think it should be included in the release.

Likewise, the fix for the only other two is in:

	  http://www.cygnus.com/ml/egcs/1997-Nov/0197.html

and it is so safe!  It involves 0 changes to any compiler code, just
the testsuite, so it in theory cannot hurt the release in any
substantial way.  I think it should be included just for the `feeling
of well being'.  I mean, we want the air of quality, right?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* egcs-971201: testsuite results for i586-pc-linux-gnulibc1
@ 1997-12-02  9:56 Max Lawson
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Max Lawson @ 1997-12-02  9:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: egcs

	Here are the results for the last snapshot. Don't know 
how, but the typename5.C failure has left !

----------
libc.5.39 & ld.so.1.9.5 & binutils-2.8.1.0.15
./configure --enable-shared
BOOT_CFLAGS="-O6 -g"

----------

Test Run By lawson on Tue Dec  2 13:45:33 1997
Native configuration is i586-pc-linux-gnulibc1

		=== gcc Summary ===

# of expected passes		4883
# of expected failures		5
# of unsupported tests		7
/tmp/egcs-971201/gcc/xgcc version egcs-2.90.20 971201 (gcc2-970802 experimental)

		=== g++ tests ===

XPASS: g++.jason/destruct3.C - (test for bogus messages, line 38)
XPASS: g++.mike/dyncast1.C  Execution test
XPASS: g++.mike/dyncast2.C  Execution test

		=== g++ Summary ===

# of expected passes		3400
# of unexpected successes	3
# of expected failures		80
# of untested testcases		6
/tmp/egcs-971201/gcc/testsuite/../xgcc version egcs-2.90.20 971201 (gcc2-970802 experimental)


		=== libio Summary ===

# of expected passes		40


		=== libstdc++ Summary ===

# of expected passes		30

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~1997-12-02 21:12 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <199712030125.RAA06256.cygnus.egcs@kankakee.wrs.com>
1997-12-02 21:12 ` egcs-971201: testsuite results for i586-pc-linux-gnulibc1 Jason Merrill
1997-12-02 18:18 Mike Stump
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1997-12-02  9:56 Max Lawson

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).