From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jason Merrill <jason@cygnus.com>
To: Peter Seebach <seebs@monolith.solon.com>
Cc: egcs@cygnus.com
Subject: Re: linux libio status
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 1997 15:19:00 -0000
Message-id: <u9iuux4tpv.fsf@yorick.cygnus.com>
References: <199710161451.JAA23217@monolith.solon.com>
X-SW-Source: 1997-10/msg00666.html

>>>>> Peter Seebach <seebs@monolith.solon.com> writes:

> In message < u9oh4q46ox.fsf@yorick.cygnus.com >, Jason Merrill writes:
>> That's why we define __need_NULL.  That tells the gcc stddef.h that we only
>> want the definition of NULL, and nothing else.

> Isn't that an order of magnitude more complicated than providing
> <null.h>, and having everything that needs NULL include it?

Do you also want to provide <size_t.h>, <ptrdiff_t.h>, <wchar_t.h> and
<wint_t.h>?  It doesn't seem excessively complicated to me, since the user
doesn't have to deal with it and we only have to do it once.

Jason