From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org, David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>,
Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
feng.tang@intel.com,
Fr??d??ric Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
jakub@redhat.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:16:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <viy9pk4xossnb6m2v041qu00.1258665258503@email.android.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 728 bytes --]
Hence a new unconstrained option...
"Jeff Law" <law@redhat.com> wrote:
>On 11/19/09 12:50, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>
>> Calling the profiler immediately at the entry point is clearly the more
>> sane option. It means the ABI is well-defined, stable, and independent
>> of what the actual function contents are. It means that ABI isn't the
>> normal C ABI (the __fentry__ function would have to preserve all
>> registers), but that's fine...
>>
>Note there are targets (even some old x86 variants) that required the
>profiling calls to occur after the prologue. Unfortunately, nobody
>documented *why* that was the case. Sigh.
>
>Jeff
--
Sent from my mobile phone. Please excuse any lack of formatting.
next reply other threads:[~2009-11-19 21:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-19 21:16 H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2009-11-19 21:26 ` Jeff Law
2009-11-19 22:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-11-20 0:00 ` Jeff Law
2009-11-20 0:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-20 1:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-20 1:29 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-20 2:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-20 1:30 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-20 5:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-20 12:06 ` Andrew Haley
2009-11-20 12:23 ` Andrew Haley
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-11-19 20:50 H. Peter Anvin
[not found] <alpine.LFD.2.00.0911181933540.24119@localhost.localdomain>
[not found] ` <tip-887a29f59b93cf54e21814869a4ab6e80b6fa623@git.kernel.org>
[not found] ` <20091119072040.GA23579@elte.hu>
[not found] ` <alpine.LFD.2.00.0911191053390.24119@localhost.localdomain>
[not found] ` <alpine.LFD.2.00.0911191423190.24119@localhost.localdomain>
2009-11-19 15:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-19 15:45 ` Andrew Haley
2009-11-19 15:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-19 15:59 ` Richard Guenther
2009-11-19 16:03 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-11-19 16:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-19 16:20 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-11-19 16:07 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-19 16:19 ` Andrew Haley
2009-11-19 16:45 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-19 16:13 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-11-19 15:46 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-19 15:51 ` Richard Guenther
2009-11-19 15:53 ` Richard Guenther
2009-11-19 17:38 ` Andi Kleen
2009-11-19 17:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-19 17:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-19 18:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-11-19 18:04 ` Richard Guenther
2009-11-19 18:23 ` Andrew Haley
2009-11-19 18:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-19 18:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-19 18:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-19 19:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-23 9:17 ` Jakub Jelinek
2009-11-23 9:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-19 19:12 ` David Daney
2009-11-19 19:29 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-11-19 19:47 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-11-19 19:55 ` Kai Tietz
2009-11-19 20:06 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-11-19 20:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-11-19 20:18 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-11-19 20:29 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-11-19 20:26 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-11-19 20:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-19 20:45 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-11-19 19:51 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-19 20:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-19 21:13 ` Jeff Law
2009-11-19 20:11 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-11-19 21:07 ` Jeff Law
2009-11-19 18:34 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-19 18:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-19 18:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-19 19:08 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-11-19 19:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-19 20:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-19 18:22 ` Andrew Haley
2009-11-19 18:34 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-11-19 18:37 ` Andrew Pinski
2009-11-19 18:38 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-19 18:38 ` Andrew Haley
2009-11-19 18:40 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=viy9pk4xossnb6m2v041qu00.1258665258503@email.android.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aph@redhat.com \
--cc=ddaney@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=law@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).