From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13182 invoked by alias); 3 Apr 2003 13:02:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13167 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2003 13:02:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imag.imag.fr) (129.88.30.1) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 3 Apr 2003 13:02:49 -0000 Received: from ecrins.imag.fr (ecrins.imag.fr [129.88.43.124]) by imag.imag.fr (8.12.9/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h33D2niE013943 for ; Thu, 3 Apr 2003 15:02:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from moy by ecrins.imag.fr with local (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1914Mj-0004CS-00 for gcc@gcc.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Apr 2003 15:02:49 +0200 To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [tree-ssa] Tree browser unstable ? From: Matthieu Moy Mail-Followup-To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2003 14:33:00 -0000 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090015 (Oort Gnus v0.15) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00140.txt.bz2 Hi, I'm using the tree-ssa branch of GCC, and starting to play with the tree browser to understand the code. (http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/tree-ssa/tree-browser.html). It is an interesting option, but I find it very unstable. I rather often get error messages like this : ,---- | (gdb) p browse_tree (fndecl) | | Tree Browser | myfunc | | /home/moy/essais/c++/hello.cc:6: internal compiler error: in walk_tree, at | tree-inline.c:1557 | Please submit a full bug report, | with preprocessed source if appropriate. | See for instructions. | | Program exited with code 01. | The program being debugged stopped while in a function called from GDB. | When the function (browse_tree) is done executing, GDB will silently | stop (instead of continuing to evaluate the expression containing | the function call). `---- So, my question is : Am I doing something wrong, or is the tree browser supposed to be robust to any kinds of use (So, should I make a bug report each time I get this kind of message ?) -- Matthieu