From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24307 invoked by alias); 5 Apr 2002 23:08:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 24292 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2002 23:08:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO executor.cambridge.redhat.com) (195.224.55.237) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Apr 2002 23:08:15 -0000 Received: from prospero.cambridge.redhat.com (dell-paw-2.cambridge.redhat.com [195.224.55.226]) by executor.cambridge.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D9DBABB01; Sat, 6 Apr 2002 00:08:15 +0100 (BST) Received: by prospero.cambridge.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 4046) id 4AF2FF79F5; Sat, 6 Apr 2002 00:08:12 +0100 (BST) To: Richard Henderson Cc: Diego Novillo , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/5504: Optimization breaks wei-ku-1 from blitz References: <20020326050034.GA29663@tornado.toronto.redhat.com> From: Jason Merrill In-Reply-To: (Jason Merrill's message of "Fri, 05 Apr 2002 23:34:40 +0100") Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2002 16:14:00 -0000 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00209.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Jason" == Jason Merrill writes: > For 3.1, one option would be to go back to doing destructor cleanups only > on the normal flow path; this would break EH semantics again for this case, > but that would not be a regression and I don't think I've ever seen a bug > report about it in past releases. I take it back; PR c++/411 is for this bug. We may still want to do this, though. Jason