From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-74990-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 2285 invoked by alias); 24 May 2003 01:23:45 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 2155 invoked from network); 24 May 2003 01:23:44 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lacrosse.corp.redhat.com) (66.187.233.200)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 May 2003 01:23:44 -0000
Received: from prospero.boston.redhat.com (sebastian-int.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.221])
	by lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id h4O1NhK18777;
	Fri, 23 May 2003 21:23:43 -0400
Received: by prospero.boston.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 4046)
	id ACB4AF7D53; Fri, 23 May 2003 21:20:16 -0400 (EDT)
To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo@redhat.com>
Cc: "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] FE dropping volatile qualifier?
From: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <1053738824.6937.165.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com> (Diego
 Novillo's message of "23 May 2003 21:13:45 -0400")
References: <1053738824.6937.165.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 24 May 2003 01:23:00 -0000
Message-ID: <wvln0hd16pb.fsf@prospero.boston.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090019 (Oort Gnus v0.19) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg02161.txt.bz2

On 23 May 2003 21:13:45 -0400, Diego Novillo <dnovillo@redhat.com> wrote:

> The SSA optimizers honor the volatile qualifier, but the FE is
> apparently removing it.

Very strange.

Jason