public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
To: "Kevin B. Hendricks" <kevin.hendricks@sympatico.ca>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, aph@redhat.com, Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: On alignment
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 18:41:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <wvlu1drl2kl.fsf@prospero.boston.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <wvl1y0vmhdv.fsf@prospero.boston.redhat.com> (Jason Merrill's message of "Tue, 25 Mar 2003 13:27:08 -0500")

On Tue, 25 Mar 2003 13:27:08 -0500, Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 25 Mar 2003 11:22:13 -0500, "Kevin B. Hendricks" <kevin.hendricks@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
>> If I am not mistaken, a similar approach was used by OpenOffice.org when trying to support 
>> both gcc 2.9.5X components and gcc 3.X components 
>
> Indeed, it looks like they're trying to do the same thing using the same
> technique that Andrew was.  Can anyone tell me whether they applied
> CPPU_GCC3_ALIGN to any long long or double fields?

The comment would appear to suggest otherwise:

// This pragma macro is appended to every first member of a struct, 
// iff the struct inherits from a base struct and the first member
// of this structure  is not a double or [unsigned] long long.

Sounds like they noticed and worked around this bug.  Which makes me more
inclined to go ahead and fix it.

Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2003-03-25 18:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-03-25 16:48 Kevin B. Hendricks
2003-03-25 18:39 ` Jason Merrill
2003-03-25 18:41   ` Jason Merrill [this message]
2003-03-25 19:14     ` Kevin B. Hendricks
2003-03-25 19:57       ` Jason Merrill
2003-04-22 11:36         ` Andrew Haley
2003-04-22 12:05           ` Nathan Sidwell
2003-04-22 12:37             ` Andrew Haley
2003-04-22 13:15           ` Andreas Schwab
2003-04-23 13:32             ` Jamie Lokier
2003-04-23 16:07               ` Jason Merrill
2003-04-23 17:41               ` Tom Tromey
2003-04-23 18:06                 ` Jason Merrill
2003-04-23 18:42                   ` Tom Tromey
2003-04-23 19:13                     ` Jason Merrill
2003-04-23 19:43                       ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2003-04-23 20:23                         ` Tom Tromey
2003-04-23 21:45                           ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2003-04-24  7:00                           ` Jason Merrill
2003-04-24 11:45                             ` Andrew Haley
2003-05-01 23:50                               ` Tom Tromey
2003-05-02 13:08                                 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2003-05-05 14:56                                   ` Jason Merrill
2003-05-08  9:58                                     ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2003-04-23 19:33                     ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2003-04-24  1:32                     ` Jamie Lokier
2003-03-25 21:27       ` Tom Tromey
2003-03-26 12:58         ` Andrew Haley
2003-03-26 22:26           ` Mark Mitchell
2003-03-25 18:57   ` Tom Tromey
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-23 19:47 Robert Dewar
2003-04-23 19:34 Joern Rennecke
2003-04-22 17:19 Robert Dewar
2003-04-22 14:43 Robert Dewar
2003-04-22 15:13 ` Andrew Haley
2003-04-22 16:22   ` Jason Merrill
2003-04-22 16:26     ` Nicola Pero
2003-04-22 17:19       ` Andrew Haley
2003-04-22 18:46       ` Jason Merrill
2003-04-22 17:17     ` Andrew Haley
2003-03-21  0:25 Jason Merrill
2003-03-21 11:49 ` Andrew Haley
2003-03-21 15:18   ` Andrew Haley
2003-03-21 19:31   ` Tom Tromey
2003-03-21 15:39 ` Michael Matz
2003-03-21 15:41   ` Andrew Haley
2003-03-22  0:25     ` Jason Merrill
2003-03-22  9:35       ` Tom Tromey
2003-03-22 10:31       ` Andrew Haley
2003-03-25  2:52         ` Jason Merrill
2003-03-25 10:16           ` Andrew Haley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=wvlu1drl2kl.fsf@prospero.boston.redhat.com \
    --to=jason@redhat.com \
    --cc=aph@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=kevin.hendricks@sympatico.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).