From: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
To: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>
Cc: geoffk@apple.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Using __extension__ in a struct with a GTY(()) mark
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2003 03:17:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <wvlznn8pf3h.fsf@prospero.boston.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200304022300.SAA17030@caip.rutgers.edu> ("Kaveh R. Ghazi"'s message of "Wed, 2 Apr 2003 18:00:52 -0500 (EST)")
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003 18:00:52 -0500 (EST), "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu> wrote:
> I'm trying to enable compiling the G++ frontend using any ISOC
> compiler. In effect, this means getting it to compile with gcc
> -pedantic. I've zapped all problems except one in which I'm running
> into a problem with gengtype and a structure using GTY(()) when I try
> to use the __extension__ keyword.
If you need to use __extension__, it won't work on other ISO C compilers.
If you really want to compile g++ with other C compilers, you need to avoid
using char bitfields.
> I added code in system.h to appropriately use int or char depending on
> whether we're using GCC via a macro CHAR_BITFIELD.
Why? If they're interchangeable, why not always use int? The problem is
that they aren't interchangeable on PCC_BITFIELD_TYPE_MATTERS targets;
using int will impose int alignment on the struct, which breaks its
intended use (if I understand it properly).
> Please help?
I'd be inclined to give up. What's wrong with requiring gcc for building
the other frontends?
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-03 1:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-03 0:11 Kaveh R. Ghazi
2003-04-03 1:23 ` Geoffrey Keating
2003-04-03 6:45 ` Kaveh R. Ghazi
2003-04-03 3:17 ` Jason Merrill [this message]
2003-04-03 5:57 ` Kaveh R. Ghazi
2003-04-03 6:15 ` Jason Merrill
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=wvlznn8pf3h.fsf@prospero.boston.redhat.com \
--to=jason@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=geoffk@apple.com \
--cc=ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).