From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6353 invoked by alias); 4 Oct 2002 16:46:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6320 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2002 16:46:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (12.150.115.133) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Oct 2002 16:46:15 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g94Gk0s27195 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2002 12:46:00 -0400 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g94GkEl27458 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2002 12:46:14 -0400 Received: from tonopah.toronto.redhat.com (tonopah.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.91]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g94GkDw04600 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2002 09:46:13 -0700 Received: (from wilson@localhost) by tonopah.toronto.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g94GkCX08666; Fri, 4 Oct 2002 12:46:12 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: tonopah.toronto.redhat.com: wilson set sender to wilson@redhat.com using -f To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: deprecate i960 now? References: <200210040018.g940Iac02570@piper.synopsys.com> From: Jim Wilson Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2002 09:55:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <200210040018.g940Iac02570@piper.synopsys.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00257.txt.bz2 >If we have no maintainer ... Technically, we have a maintainer, me, however, I have no interest in fixing any i960 bugs at present, and offer to resign every time the topic comes up. There is some small benefit to listing me as maintainer, since at least then people know who to ask questions of. I answered a few i960 ABI questions for Richard Henderson yesterday. So the question here is whether it is better to have no maintainer at all or a maintainer who is willing to answer questions but not willing to fix bugs. Either way is fine with me. Jim