From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23289 invoked by alias); 16 Aug 2009 13:51:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 23279 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Aug 2009 13:51:33 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.gmx.net (HELO mail.gmx.net) (213.165.64.20) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with SMTP; Sun, 16 Aug 2009 13:51:25 +0000 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 16 Aug 2009 13:51:22 -0000 Received: from p5B11E914.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO gmx.de) [91.17.233.20] by mail.gmx.net (mp008) with SMTP; 16 Aug 2009 15:51:22 +0200 From: Bernd Roesch To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 22:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <2fdfa587.3e8d2013.4a87ec55.d57bd@o2.pl> Subject: Re: GCC 4..4.x speed regression - help? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-08/txt/msg00272.txt.bz2 please correct the Bugreport 40454 with the values of gcc 4.1.2 4.2.5. it seem 4.1.2 reach near same speed as 3.4.0 but all later gcc are slower in some programs. this can also see on ffmpeg. also on X86 ffmpeg see here it is see. what is change after 4.1.2 that can cause slower executable speed ? here can also see on ffmpeg X86 that GCC compiler upto 4.1.2 get near same speed, then on 4.2.4 it get suddenly slower. http://multimedia.cx/eggs/intel-beats-up-gcc/ On 16.08.09, you wrote: > Hi, > > I found out that GCC 4.4.x build of minigzip from zlib package is a lot > slower compared to GCC 3.4.0 build. Maybe someone can compile minigzip for > his system with GCC 3.4.x and GCC 4.4.x and compare time of compression > with bigger file? This way we would know if this regression only happens > on the m68k GCC or maybe on other platforms too. > > I really don't like regressions like this :/ > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40454 > > Regards > Regards