From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (smtp.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [129.70.160.84]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 620D8385781F; Sun, 15 Nov 2020 11:25:39 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 620D8385781F Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=ro@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16B6CA492; Sun, 15 Nov 2020 12:25:38 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE Received: from smtp.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K7amQJ7BhA1i; Sun, 15 Nov 2020 12:25:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (p4fddb2f4.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.221.178.244]) by smtp.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5F58CA517; Sun, 15 Nov 2020 12:25:37 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE; s=20200306; t=1605439537; bh=1WNe6uHiHP7S2lLibW1r49DwaA9ConCzSfeDF63ugws=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=BlyT+MF1WuvN837UB4EH7ZR0e0piezROyiPmPf4w10TVjkLdiFl7p/B4UqUIHed2D nV8s+TTkQ7GWjFr3XudLWut1D4ibdTeZ55jkohjJ2/WlDFJRNpqAkiwi0c1vx3gOp2 8yjlpEZQV3Vzr0QlqmGN08SdaKL6+DW+1dKA6Feydp0PlY3/NsTaYDcZrDI66w5EWD rjplqv4b+pA0JFl+JVdtyxuMcs3RDDEtbGvwyG7rgcJDjwGC7XafR91tO77pmE+qFZ ValSwXjqff83I8jfhQGjy46kmaN0wprOfUY6WVUmx6y4m2EfGIZf7ipduCyU8cPuY7 bvgKq81wyMhyQ== From: Rainer Orth To: Jan Hubicka Cc: Andreas Schwab , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Richard Biener , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Detect EAF flags in ipa-modref References: <20201108124711.GD65107@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <20201109102946.GA83507@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <20201109131632.GA12394@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <20201109231418.GF65107@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <20201110125418.GB53229@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <20201110143143.GA91644@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <87361ahph7.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <20201115111254.GB45304@kam.mff.cuni.cz> Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2020 12:25:36 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20201115111254.GB45304@kam.mff.cuni.cz> (Jan Hubicka's message of "Sun, 15 Nov 2020 12:12:54 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (usg-unix-v) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3790.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2020 11:25:41 -0000 Hi Jan, >> This breaks bootstrap with go. >> >> ../../gcc/go/gofrontend/go-diagnostics.cc: In function 'std::string expand_message(const char*, va_list)': >> ../../gcc/go/gofrontend/go-diagnostics.cc:110:61: error: '' may be used uninitialized [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized] >> 110 | "memory allocation failed in vasprintf"); >> | ^ > > Well, this may be simply a false positive (except that the warning is > clearly mislocalted and cryptic) I was bootstrapping with go just few > minutes ago, so I wonder what configure flags you use? I'm seeing the same on both i386-pc-solaris2.11 and sparc-sun-solaris2.11, so I don't think there are special configure flags involved. Rainer -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University