From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16356 invoked by alias); 10 Apr 2012 16:22:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 16336 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Apr 2012 16:22:14 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from snape.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (HELO smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE) (129.70.160.84) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 16:22:01 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C415DF9 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 18:21:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (malfoy.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id iPhn7KCJopdv for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 18:21:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [129.70.161.120]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E3A8DF8 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 18:21:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from ro@localhost) by manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (8.14.5+Sun/8.14.5/Submit) id q3AGLws0009110; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 18:21:58 +0200 (MEST) From: Rainer Orth To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: RFH - Testing targets for the switch to C++ References: <4F8451F3.8040001@google.com> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 16:22:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Marc Glisse's message of "Tue, 10 Apr 2012 18:13:53 +0200 (CEST)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (usg-unix-v) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00345.txt.bz2 Marc Glisse writes: >> Thanks for the heads-up, that saved me time and effort. Do you have CRs >> for the CC bugs? > > http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7073578 > http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7073575 > > I think that was it, but I can't remember for sure. Thanks. Unfortunately, they were both classified as low-priority and thus not backported to 12.2. Not really an issue since 12.3 is already available, just important to document when we throw the switch. > Other people tried too, there are traces in gcc's bugzilla (50167 and 50177 > are still there, but there used to be a few more). Ok. Rainer -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University