From: Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu>
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: cvs (was: Bootstrap failure of gcc-ss-20010409 in ia64)
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2001 23:48:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ylbspyodzf.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200104150520.WAA06280@wilson.cygnus.com>
Jim Wilson <wilson@cygnus.com> writes:
> Neither problem exists if you use co instead of update. Thus it is
> always better to use co instead of update -d.
Last time I tried this, cvs co always sent the entire file across the
connection, while cvs update knew how to generate a patch and send that
instead if the changes were small or the file large. Thus there was an
advantage to using update instead of co if update wouldn't cause problems.
I don't know if this is still the case, though. I'd need to experiment
further.
--
Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu) < http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/ >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-04-14 23:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-04-11 6:56 Bootstrap failure of gcc-ss-20010409 in ia64 Andreas Schwab
2001-04-11 12:47 ` Jim Wilson
2001-04-11 17:31 ` Mark Mitchell
2001-04-11 17:43 ` Mark Mitchell
2001-04-11 18:28 ` Daniel Berlin
2001-04-11 18:34 ` Mark Mitchell
2001-04-11 20:24 ` Daniel Berlin
2001-04-11 21:19 ` Mark Mitchell
2001-04-11 21:36 ` Daniel Berlin
2001-04-12 12:27 ` Bill Nottingham
2001-04-12 15:03 ` Daniel Berlin
2001-04-12 21:07 ` Bill Nottingham
2001-04-12 21:46 ` Daniel Berlin
2001-04-12 13:04 ` Jim Wilson
2001-04-12 15:06 ` Daniel Berlin
2001-04-13 8:49 ` Andreas Schwab
2001-04-13 10:04 ` Daniel Berlin
2001-04-13 10:23 ` Andreas Schwab
2001-04-13 12:20 ` Daniel Berlin
2001-04-13 12:39 ` Andreas Schwab
2001-04-13 12:56 ` Daniel Berlin
2001-04-13 13:06 ` Andreas Schwab
2001-04-13 19:13 ` Jim Wilson
2001-04-13 19:59 ` Jim Wilson
2001-04-14 2:01 ` Jim Wilson
2001-04-14 4:08 ` Sam TH
2001-04-14 8:27 ` cvs (was: Bootstrap failure of gcc-ss-20010409 in ia64) Fergus Henderson
2001-04-14 11:28 ` Sam TH
2001-04-14 22:20 ` Jim Wilson
2001-04-14 23:48 ` Russ Allbery [this message]
2001-04-16 15:39 ` Bootstrap failure of gcc-ss-20010409 in ia64 Jim Wilson
2001-04-16 17:22 ` Mark Mitchell
2001-04-16 17:45 ` Jim Wilson
2001-04-17 8:22 ` Mark Mitchell
2001-04-17 8:57 ` Daniel Berlin
2001-04-17 11:01 ` Jim Wilson
2001-04-17 15:38 ` Mark Mitchell
2001-04-17 16:16 ` Daniel Berlin
2001-04-17 16:36 ` Mark Mitchell
2001-04-18 14:35 ` debugging optimized programs (Was: Re: Bootstrap failure of gcc-ss-20010409 in ia64) Joern Rennecke
2001-04-18 15:12 ` Daniel Berlin
2001-04-18 15:49 ` Joern Rennecke
2001-04-18 17:06 ` Daniel Berlin
2001-04-18 17:18 ` Daniel Berlin
2001-04-18 12:41 ` Bootstrap failure of gcc-ss-20010409 in ia64 Jim Wilson
2001-04-18 13:49 ` Mark Mitchell
2001-04-18 14:34 ` Jim Wilson
2001-04-18 15:31 ` Mark Mitchell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ylbspyodzf.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu \
--to=rra@stanford.edu \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).