public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: waffl3x <waffl3x@protonmail.com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>, "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Stage 4 date
Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2024 23:39:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <zJGYsVqgey8FzO72TWjK9O3RCTdCFOmKrLT_QT16nubcdWbD1c_i18JLyIqFGn620qtRFTXG5h-pVfJXYI7pzVs0ktVYcpc8OomTskrWDTg=@protonmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZZskDL0WCk4PAyMp@tucnak>






On Sunday, January 7th, 2024 at 3:22 PM, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:


> 
> 
> On Sun, Jan 07, 2024 at 03:12:32PM -0700, Jeff Law via Gcc wrote:
> 
> > On 1/7/24 08:48, waffl3x via Gcc wrote:
> > 
> > > https://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html#timeline
> > > The date for stage 4 is listed as the 8th on here, is that date final?
> > > There is at least 1 patch pending (mine) that is complete but Jason
> > > Merril hasn't been active for a few days. He had expressed to me that
> > > he expected the date to be next week on the 14th. Is it possible to
> > > push back the date for stage 4 a little bit? I've been working hard on
> > > my patch and would be very disappointed if it did not make it in for
> > > GCC14.
> 
> > Note there is generally allowances made for patches that were posted before
> > the deadline, but are still going through the review/iterate process.
> 
> 
> Also, not really sure why the stage 4 start is relevant to this patch,
> it is a new feature, not a bug fix, which admittedly had some versions
> posted already during stage 1, so if Jason accepts it soon I have no problem
> with it getting in (in fact I'd appreciate if it got in soon), but end of
> stage 3 is deadline for patches which are fixing bugs but not regression bugs.
> 
> Jakub

Gotcha, in addition to the other clarifications that were made on IRC this
makes sense. I was worried over nothing! Everything has been submitted in so I
think it should be in soon.

Thanks for the responses, and all the patience I've been shown the past months.

Alex

      reply	other threads:[~2024-01-07 23:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-07 15:48 waffl3x
2024-01-07 22:12 ` Jeff Law
2024-01-07 22:22   ` Jakub Jelinek
2024-01-07 23:39     ` waffl3x [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='zJGYsVqgey8FzO72TWjK9O3RCTdCFOmKrLT_QT16nubcdWbD1c_i18JLyIqFGn620qtRFTXG5h-pVfJXYI7pzVs0ktVYcpc8OomTskrWDTg=@protonmail.com' \
    --to=waffl3x@protonmail.com \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=jeffreyalaw@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).