From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-announce-return-46-listarch-gdb-announce=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 32385 invoked by alias); 18 Nov 2003 04:54:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-announce-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-announce-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-announce/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-announce@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-announce-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-announce-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 18583 invoked from network); 18 Nov 2003 04:15:08 -0000
Message-ID: <3FB99CC6.6030205@gnu.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 04:54:00 -0000
From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030820
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gdb-announce@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Obsolete GDB's OSF 1 and OSF 2 support
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2003/txt/msg00009.txt.bz2

Hello,

Can anyone think of a good reason for retaining support for

     Alpha OSF 1
     Alpha OSF 2

(leaving Alpha OSF 3 ... which includes True64)

Andrew