public inbox for gdb-cvs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lancelot SIX <lsix@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-cvs@sourceware.org
Subject: [binutils-gdb] gdb/testsuite: prefer gdb_test in gdb.dwarf2/calling-convention
Date: Thu, 26 May 2022 08:40:26 +0000 (GMT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220526084026.9631038356B9@sourceware.org> (raw)

https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=bfcd7c2160fd145a9d7ff215ff28cdf5e406af5a

commit bfcd7c2160fd145a9d7ff215ff28cdf5e406af5a
Author: Lancelot SIX <lancelot.six@amd.com>
Date:   Wed May 25 14:38:57 2022 +0100

    gdb/testsuite: prefer gdb_test in gdb.dwarf2/calling-convention
    
    Since ed01945057c "Make gdb_test's question non-optional if specified",
    if the question and response parameters are given to gdb_test, the
    framework enforces that GDB asks the question.  Before this patch, tests
    needed to use gdb_test_multiple to enforce this.
    
    This patch updates the gdb.dwarf2/calling-convention.exp testcase to use
    gdb_test to check that GDB asks a question.  This replaces the more
    complicated gdb_test_multiple based implementation.
    
    Tested on x86_64-gnu-linux.
    
    Change-Id: I7216e822ca68f2727e0450970097d74c27c432fe

Diff:
---
 gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/calling-convention.exp | 14 ++++++++------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/calling-convention.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/calling-convention.exp
index 77107a42350..8c87a69ebdf 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/calling-convention.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/calling-convention.exp
@@ -83,12 +83,14 @@ gdb_test "call foo ()" \
 gdb_breakpoint "foo"
 gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "foo"
 
-gdb_test_multiple "return 35" "" {
-    -re "Function 'foo' does not follow the target calling convention.\r\nIf you continue, setting the return value will probably lead to unpredictable behaviors.\r\nMake foo return now\\? \\(y or n\\) $" {
-	pass $gdb_test_name
-	gdb_test "n" "Not confirmed" "cancel return"
-    }
-}
+gdb_test "return 35" \
+       "Not confirmed" \
+       "return 35" \
+       [multi_line \
+           "Function 'foo' does not follow the target calling convention\\." \
+           "If you continue, setting the return value will probably lead to unpredictable behaviors\\." \
+           "Make foo return now\\? \\(y or n\\) $"] \
+       "n"
 
 gdb_test "finish" [multi_line \
     "Run till exit from #0  $hex in foo \\(\\)" \


                 reply	other threads:[~2022-05-26  8:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220526084026.9631038356B9@sourceware.org \
    --to=lsix@sourceware.org \
    --cc=gdb-cvs@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).