public inbox for gdb-cvs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lancelot SIX <lsix@sourceware.org> To: gdb-cvs@sourceware.org Subject: [binutils-gdb] gdb/testsuite: prefer gdb_test in gdb.dwarf2/calling-convention Date: Thu, 26 May 2022 08:40:26 +0000 (GMT) [thread overview] Message-ID: <20220526084026.9631038356B9@sourceware.org> (raw) https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=bfcd7c2160fd145a9d7ff215ff28cdf5e406af5a commit bfcd7c2160fd145a9d7ff215ff28cdf5e406af5a Author: Lancelot SIX <lancelot.six@amd.com> Date: Wed May 25 14:38:57 2022 +0100 gdb/testsuite: prefer gdb_test in gdb.dwarf2/calling-convention Since ed01945057c "Make gdb_test's question non-optional if specified", if the question and response parameters are given to gdb_test, the framework enforces that GDB asks the question. Before this patch, tests needed to use gdb_test_multiple to enforce this. This patch updates the gdb.dwarf2/calling-convention.exp testcase to use gdb_test to check that GDB asks a question. This replaces the more complicated gdb_test_multiple based implementation. Tested on x86_64-gnu-linux. Change-Id: I7216e822ca68f2727e0450970097d74c27c432fe Diff: --- gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/calling-convention.exp | 14 ++++++++------ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/calling-convention.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/calling-convention.exp index 77107a42350..8c87a69ebdf 100644 --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/calling-convention.exp +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/calling-convention.exp @@ -83,12 +83,14 @@ gdb_test "call foo ()" \ gdb_breakpoint "foo" gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "foo" -gdb_test_multiple "return 35" "" { - -re "Function 'foo' does not follow the target calling convention.\r\nIf you continue, setting the return value will probably lead to unpredictable behaviors.\r\nMake foo return now\\? \\(y or n\\) $" { - pass $gdb_test_name - gdb_test "n" "Not confirmed" "cancel return" - } -} +gdb_test "return 35" \ + "Not confirmed" \ + "return 35" \ + [multi_line \ + "Function 'foo' does not follow the target calling convention\\." \ + "If you continue, setting the return value will probably lead to unpredictable behaviors\\." \ + "Make foo return now\\? \\(y or n\\) $"] \ + "n" gdb_test "finish" [multi_line \ "Run till exit from #0 $hex in foo \\(\\)" \
reply other threads:[~2022-05-26 8:40 UTC|newest] Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20220526084026.9631038356B9@sourceware.org \ --to=lsix@sourceware.org \ --cc=gdb-cvs@sourceware.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).