public inbox for gdb-cvs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [binutils-gdb] gdb: check for duplicate register names in selftest
@ 2022-10-02 16:27 Andrew Burgess
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Andrew Burgess @ 2022-10-02 16:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-cvs
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=9a103324fee16bf4d0bc4fa7b19f5d937d47b881
commit 9a103324fee16bf4d0bc4fa7b19f5d937d47b881
Author: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
Date: Wed Aug 31 11:40:16 2022 +0100
gdb: check for duplicate register names in selftest
Building on the previous commit, this commit extends the register_name
selftest to check for duplicate register names.
If two registers in the cooked register set (real + pseudo registers)
have the same name, then this will show up as duplicate registers in
the 'info all-registers' output, but the user will only be able to
interact with one copy of the register.
In this commit I extend the selftest that I added in the previous
commit to check for duplicate register names, I didn't include this
functionality in the previous commit because one architecture needed
fixing, and I wanted to keep those fixes separate from the fixes in
the previous commit.
The problematic architecture(s) are powerpc:750 and powerpc:604. In
both of these cases the 'dabr' register appears twice, there's a
definition of dabr in power-oea.xml which is included into both
powerpc-604.xml and powerpc-750.xml. Both of these later two xml
files also define the dabr register.
I'm hopeful that this change shouldn't break anything, but I don't
have the ability to actually test this change, however:
On the gdbserver side, neither powerpc-604.xml nor powerpc-750.xml are
mentioned in gdbserver/configure.srv, which I think means that
gdbserver will never use these descriptions, and,
Within GDB the problematic descriptions are held in the variables
tdesc_powerpc_604 and tdesc_powerpc_750, which are only mentioned in
the variants array in rs6000-tdep.c, this is used when looking up a
description based on the architecture.
For a native Linux target however, this will not be used as
ppc_linux_nat_target::read_description exists, which calls
ppc_linux_match_description, which I don't believe can return either
of the problematic descriptions.
This leaves the other native targets, FreeBSD, AIX, etc. These don't
appear to override the ::read_description method, so will potentially
return the problematic descriptions, but, in each case I think the
::fetch_registers and ::store_registers methods will ignore the dabr
register, which will leave the register as <unavailable>.
So, my proposed solution is to just remove the duplicate register from
each of powerpc-604.xml and powerpc-750.xml, then regenerate the
corresponding C++ source file. With this change made, the selftest
now passes for all architectures.
Diff:
---
gdb/features/rs6000/powerpc-604.c | 13 ++++++-------
gdb/features/rs6000/powerpc-604.xml | 1 -
gdb/features/rs6000/powerpc-750.c | 1 -
gdb/features/rs6000/powerpc-750.xml | 1 -
gdb/gdbarch-selftests.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
5 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdb/features/rs6000/powerpc-604.c b/gdb/features/rs6000/powerpc-604.c
index 09cbb50129f..16e6c12dae9 100644
--- a/gdb/features/rs6000/powerpc-604.c
+++ b/gdb/features/rs6000/powerpc-604.c
@@ -141,13 +141,12 @@ initialize_tdesc_powerpc_604 (void)
tdesc_create_reg (feature, "hid0", 119, 1, NULL, 32, "int");
tdesc_create_reg (feature, "hid1", 120, 1, NULL, 32, "int");
tdesc_create_reg (feature, "iabr", 121, 1, NULL, 32, "int");
- tdesc_create_reg (feature, "dabr", 122, 1, NULL, 32, "int");
- tdesc_create_reg (feature, "pir", 123, 1, NULL, 32, "int");
- tdesc_create_reg (feature, "mmcr0", 124, 1, NULL, 32, "int");
- tdesc_create_reg (feature, "pmc1", 125, 1, NULL, 32, "int");
- tdesc_create_reg (feature, "pmc2", 126, 1, NULL, 32, "int");
- tdesc_create_reg (feature, "sia", 127, 1, NULL, 32, "int");
- tdesc_create_reg (feature, "sda", 128, 1, NULL, 32, "int");
+ tdesc_create_reg (feature, "pir", 122, 1, NULL, 32, "int");
+ tdesc_create_reg (feature, "mmcr0", 123, 1, NULL, 32, "int");
+ tdesc_create_reg (feature, "pmc1", 124, 1, NULL, 32, "int");
+ tdesc_create_reg (feature, "pmc2", 125, 1, NULL, 32, "int");
+ tdesc_create_reg (feature, "sia", 126, 1, NULL, 32, "int");
+ tdesc_create_reg (feature, "sda", 127, 1, NULL, 32, "int");
tdesc_powerpc_604 = result.release ();
}
diff --git a/gdb/features/rs6000/powerpc-604.xml b/gdb/features/rs6000/powerpc-604.xml
index fbc9e946d22..052cfbb7e76 100644
--- a/gdb/features/rs6000/powerpc-604.xml
+++ b/gdb/features/rs6000/powerpc-604.xml
@@ -17,7 +17,6 @@
<reg name="hid0" bitsize="32"/>
<reg name="hid1" bitsize="32"/>
<reg name="iabr" bitsize="32"/>
- <reg name="dabr" bitsize="32"/>
<reg name="pir" bitsize="32"/>
<reg name="mmcr0" bitsize="32"/>
<reg name="pmc1" bitsize="32"/>
diff --git a/gdb/features/rs6000/powerpc-750.c b/gdb/features/rs6000/powerpc-750.c
index 60a7b412070..3c9e7e1d23a 100644
--- a/gdb/features/rs6000/powerpc-750.c
+++ b/gdb/features/rs6000/powerpc-750.c
@@ -141,7 +141,6 @@ initialize_tdesc_powerpc_750 (void)
tdesc_create_reg (feature, "hid0", 119, 1, NULL, 32, "int");
tdesc_create_reg (feature, "hid1", 120, 1, NULL, 32, "int");
tdesc_create_reg (feature, "iabr", 121, 1, NULL, 32, "int");
- tdesc_create_reg (feature, "dabr", 122, 1, NULL, 32, "int");
tdesc_create_reg (feature, "ummcr0", 124, 1, NULL, 32, "int");
tdesc_create_reg (feature, "upmc1", 125, 1, NULL, 32, "int");
tdesc_create_reg (feature, "upmc2", 126, 1, NULL, 32, "int");
diff --git a/gdb/features/rs6000/powerpc-750.xml b/gdb/features/rs6000/powerpc-750.xml
index 908ecbdfd96..dfc5a87aaa0 100644
--- a/gdb/features/rs6000/powerpc-750.xml
+++ b/gdb/features/rs6000/powerpc-750.xml
@@ -17,7 +17,6 @@
<reg name="hid0" bitsize="32"/>
<reg name="hid1" bitsize="32"/>
<reg name="iabr" bitsize="32"/>
- <reg name="dabr" bitsize="32"/>
<reg name="ummcr0" bitsize="32" regnum="124"/>
<reg name="upmc1" bitsize="32"/>
<reg name="upmc2" bitsize="32"/>
diff --git a/gdb/gdbarch-selftests.c b/gdb/gdbarch-selftests.c
index 68254412ed6..fa3f4d180cf 100644
--- a/gdb/gdbarch-selftests.c
+++ b/gdb/gdbarch-selftests.c
@@ -27,6 +27,8 @@
#include "gdbarch.h"
#include "scoped-mock-context.h"
+#include <map>
+
namespace selftests {
/* Test gdbarch methods register_to_value and value_to_register. */
@@ -129,6 +131,9 @@ register_name_test (struct gdbarch *gdbarch)
{
scoped_mock_context<test_target_ops> mockctx (gdbarch);
+ /* Track the number of times each register name appears. */
+ std::map<const std::string, int> name_counts;
+
const int num_regs = gdbarch_num_cooked_regs (gdbarch);
for (auto regnum = 0; regnum < num_regs; regnum++)
{
@@ -141,8 +146,22 @@ register_name_test (struct gdbarch *gdbarch)
debug_printf ("arch: %s, register: %d returned nullptr\n",
gdbarch_bfd_arch_info (gdbarch)->printable_name,
regnum);
-
SELF_CHECK (name != nullptr);
+
+ /* Every register name, that is not the empty string, should be
+ unique. If this is not the case then the user will see duplicate
+ copies of the register in e.g. 'info registers' output, but will
+ only be able to interact with one of the copies. */
+ if (*name != '\0')
+ {
+ std::string s (name);
+ name_counts[s]++;
+ if (run_verbose() && name_counts[s] > 1)
+ debug_printf ("arch: %s, register: %d (%s) is a duplicate\n",
+ gdbarch_bfd_arch_info (gdbarch)->printable_name,
+ regnum, name);
+ SELF_CHECK (name_counts[s] == 1);
+ }
}
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2022-10-02 16:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-10-02 16:27 [binutils-gdb] gdb: check for duplicate register names in selftest Andrew Burgess
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).